From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [jpoimboe:sframe-2.2 3/9] mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:21:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410211309.narb075Z-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jpoimboe/linux.git sframe-2.2
head: 757574ba1822accfdae6ec405421f5e2df48fe52
commit: c689ba830937835b9098f0cd4d6cfeece2e8f71d [3/9] unwind: Introduce sframe userspace unwinding
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241021/202410211309.narb075Z-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bfe84f7085d82d06d61c632a7bad1e692fd159e4)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241021/202410211309.narb075Z-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410211309.narb075Z-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:8:
In file included from include/linux/mman.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2232:
include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression
45 | INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm),
| ^
13 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +45 mm/init-mm.c
18
19 /*
20 * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask
21 * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on the maximum CPU
22 * number the system can see. That way we allocate only as much memory for
23 * mm_cpumask() as needed for the hundreds, or thousands of processes that
24 * a system typically runs.
25 *
26 * Since there is only one init_mm in the entire system, keep it simple
27 * and size this cpu_bitmask to NR_CPUS.
28 */
29 struct mm_struct init_mm = {
30 .mm_mt = MTREE_INIT_EXT(mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS, init_mm.mmap_lock),
31 .pgd = swapper_pg_dir,
32 .mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
33 .mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
34 .write_protect_seq = SEQCNT_ZERO(init_mm.write_protect_seq),
35 MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER(init_mm)
36 .page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock),
37 .arg_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.arg_lock),
38 .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist),
39 #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
40 .mm_lock_seq = 0,
41 #endif
42 .user_ns = &init_user_ns,
43 .cpu_bitmap = CPU_BITS_NONE,
44 #ifdef INIT_MM_CONTEXT
> 45 INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm),
46 #endif
47 #ifdef INIT_MM_SFRAME
48 INIT_MM_SFRAME,
49 #endif
50 };
51
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410211309.narb075Z-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.