* Is fsmap supposed to use open or closed intervals?
@ 2024-10-22 1:47 Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2024-10-22 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Filesystem Development List, Ext4 Developers List,
Darrick J. Wong
I was debugging ext4's failure with the new test generic/365, which
was testing the regressions fixed by commits 68415b349f3f ("xfs: Fix
the owner setting issue for rmap query in xfs fsmap") and ca6448aed4f1
("xfs: Fix missing interval for missing_owner in xfs fsmap"). It
appears that ext4 has a similar bug, but then when I started looking
at how XFS handles fsmap, it's a bit unclear whether the intervals
queried are supposed to be open, closed, or half-open.
Looking at how 6.11-rc4's xfs handles fsmap, these two results seem to
be a bit contradictory:
root@kvm-xfstests:~# xfs_io -i -c "fsmap -d 104 127" /vdd
0: 254:48 [104..126]: free space 23
OK, so it looks like fsmap returns the half-open interval [104 127).
But then I tried this:
root@kvm-xfstests:~# xfs_io -i -c "fsmap -d 104 128" /vdd
0: 254:48 [104..127]: free space 24
1: 254:48 [128..191]: inodes 64
and the fact that this query returns the region between [128, 191] is
surprising.
Is this a bug? Is it OK if we expand the interval and return more
blocks than what the application program queried?
Thanks,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-10-22 1:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-22 1:47 Is fsmap supposed to use open or closed intervals? Theodore Ts'o
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.