From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 01/12] rtnetlink: Make per-netns RTNL dereference helpers to macro.
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:58:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241023185850.GC402847@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241021183239.79741-2-kuniyu@amazon.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:32:28AM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL is off, rtnl_net_dereference() is the
> static inline wrapper of rtnl_dereference() returning a plain (void *)
> pointer to make sure net is always evaluated as requested in [0].
>
> But, it makes sparse complain [1] when the pointer has __rcu annotation:
>
> net/ipv4/devinet.c:674:47: sparse: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> net/ipv4/devinet.c:674:47: sparse: expected void *p
> net/ipv4/devinet.c:674:47: sparse: got struct in_ifaddr [noderef] __rcu *
>
> Also, if we evaluate net as (void *) in a macro, then the compiler
> in turn fails to build due to -Werror=unused-value.
>
> #define rtnl_net_dereference(net, p) \
> ({ \
> (void *)net; \
> rtnl_dereference(p); \
> })
>
> net/ipv4/devinet.c: In function ‘inet_rtm_deladdr’:
> ./include/linux/rtnetlink.h:154:17: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
> 154 | (void *)net; \
> net/ipv4/devinet.c:674:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘rtnl_net_dereference’
> 674 | (ifa = rtnl_net_dereference(net, *ifap)) != NULL;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Let's go back to the original simplest macro.
>
> Note that checkpatch complains about this approach, but it's one-shot and
> less noisy than the other two.
>
> WARNING: Argument 'net' is not used in function-like macro
> #76: FILE: include/linux/rtnetlink.h:142:
> +#define rtnl_net_dereference(net, p) \
> + rtnl_dereference(p)
>
> Fixes: 844e5e7e656d ("rtnetlink: Add assertion helpers for per-netns RTNL.")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241004132145.7fd208e9@kernel.org/ [0]
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410200325.SaEJmyZS-lkp@intel.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Thanks,
I was able to reproduce the build problem as described.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 18:32 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/12] ipv4: Convert RTM_{NEW,DEL}ADDR and more to per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/12] rtnetlink: Make per-netns RTNL dereference helpers to macro Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-23 18:58 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/12] rtnetlink: Define RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET for per-netns RTNL doit() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/12] ipv4: Factorise RTM_NEWADDR validation to inet_validate_rtm() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/12] ipv4: Don't allocate ifa for 0.0.0.0 in inet_rtm_newaddr() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/12] ipv4: Convert RTM_NEWADDR to per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/12] ipv4: Use per-netns RTNL helpers in inet_rtm_newaddr() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/12] ipv4: Convert RTM_DELADDR to per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/12] ipv4: Convert check_lifetime() " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/12] rtnetlink: Define rtnl_net_trylock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/12] ipv4: Convert devinet_sysctl_forward() to per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/12] ipv4: Convert devinet_ioctl() to per-netns RTNL except for SIOCSIFFLAGS Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/12] ipv4: Convert devinet_ioctl to per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 00/12] ipv4: Convert RTM_{NEW,DEL}ADDR and more " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241023185850.GC402847@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.