From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,yeweihua4@huawei.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,sj@kernel.org,sieberf@amazon.com,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,foersleo@amazon.de,zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:00:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241024030002.1AA7BC4CEC6@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:39:26 +0800
Patch series "mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in
damon_va_evenly_split_region()". v2.
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision, then
each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to 'end'
would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
And add 'nr_piece == 1' check in damon_va_evenly_split_region() for better
code readability and add a corresponding kunit testcase.
This patch (of 2):
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision,
then each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to
'end' would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
After this patch, damon-operations test passed:
# ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run damon-operations
[...]
============== damon-operations (6 subtests) ===============
[PASSED] damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions1
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions2
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions3
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions4
[PASSED] damon_test_split_evenly
================ [PASSED] damon-operations =================
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-1-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-2-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 3f49584b262c ("mm/damon: implement primitives for the virtual memory address spaces")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
Cc: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Ye Weihua <yeweihua4@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h | 1 +
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h~mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region
+++ a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void damon_test_split_evenly(stru
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 3, 2);
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
}
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c~mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region
+++ a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(
unsigned long sz_orig, sz_piece, orig_end;
struct damon_region *n = NULL, *next;
unsigned long start;
+ unsigned int i;
if (!r || !nr_pieces)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -80,8 +81,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(
r->ar.end = r->ar.start + sz_piece;
next = damon_next_region(r);
- for (start = r->ar.end; start + sz_piece <= orig_end;
- start += sz_piece) {
+ for (start = r->ar.end, i = 1; i < nr_pieces; start += sz_piece, i++) {
n = damon_new_region(start, start + sz_piece);
if (!n)
return -ENOMEM;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com are
mm-damon-vaddr-fix-issue-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region.patch
mm-damon-vaddr-add-nr_piece-==-1-check-in-damon_va_evenly_split_region.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241024030002.1AA7BC4CEC6@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=foersleo@amazon.de \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yeweihua4@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.