From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Friedrich Vock <friedrich.vock@gmx.de>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] kernel/cgroup: Add "dev" memory accounting cgroup
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:44:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410251311.OLEnaBoD-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023075302.27194-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Hi Maarten,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241024]
[cannot apply to tj-cgroup/for-next drm-xe/drm-xe-next akpm-mm/mm-everything drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-tip/drm-tip]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maarten-Lankhorst/kernel-cgroup-Add-dev-memory-accounting-cgroup/20241023-155504
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm drm-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023075302.27194-2-maarten.lankhorst%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/7] kernel/cgroup: Add "dev" memory accounting cgroup
config: i386-randconfig-061-20241025 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251311.OLEnaBoD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251311.OLEnaBoD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410251311.OLEnaBoD-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: struct list_head *
>> kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/cgroup/dev.c:423:9: sparse: struct list_head *
kernel/cgroup/dev.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/smp.h, include/linux/lockdep.h, include/linux/spinlock.h, ...):
include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true
include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true
include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true
vim +423 kernel/cgroup/dev.c
400
401 /**
402 * dev_cgroup_unregister_device() - Unregister a previously registered device.
403 * @cgdev: The device to unregister.
404 *
405 * This function undoes dev_cgroup_register_device.
406 */
407 void dev_cgroup_unregister_device(struct dev_cgroup_device *cgdev)
408 {
409 struct devcg_device *dev;
410 struct list_head *entry;
411
412 if (!cgdev || !cgdev->priv)
413 return;
414
415 dev = cgdev->priv;
416 cgdev->priv = NULL;
417
418 spin_lock(&devcg_lock);
419
420 /* Remove from global device list */
421 list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_node);
422
> 423 list_for_each_rcu(entry, &dev->pools) {
424 struct dev_cgroup_pool_state *pool =
425 container_of(entry, typeof(*pool), dev_node);
426
427 list_del_rcu(&pool->css_node);
428 }
429
430 /*
431 * Ensure any RCU based lookups fail. Additionally,
432 * no new pools should be added to the dead device
433 * by get_cg_pool_unlocked.
434 */
435 dev->unregistered = true;
436 spin_unlock(&devcg_lock);
437
438 kref_put(&dev->ref, devcg_free_device);
439 }
440 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_cgroup_unregister_device);
441
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 7:52 [PATCH 0/7] kernel/cgroups: Add "dev" memory accounting cgroup Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] kernel/cgroup: " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 15:26 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-11 9:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-25 5:44 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-28 14:53 ` Friedrich Vock
2024-11-11 22:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-14 8:45 ` Friedrich Vock
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/drv: Add drmm cgroup registration for dev cgroups Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 8:45 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-24 10:35 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-24 15:42 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/ttm: Handle cgroup based eviction in TTM Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-24 11:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-24 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-25 4:12 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Implement cgroup for vram Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/amdgpu: Add cgroups implementation Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 7:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] [HACK] drm/xe: Hack to test with mapped pages instead of vram Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-23 8:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-23 7:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] [DISCUSSION] drm/gem: Add cgroup memory accounting Maarten Lankhorst
2024-10-24 14:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 8:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for kernel/cgroups: Add "dev" memory accounting cgroup Patchwork
2024-10-23 8:12 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-23 8:12 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-23 19:40 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Tejun Heo
2024-10-24 7:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-10-24 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-28 10:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-10-29 20:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-11-06 10:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-11-06 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-13 14:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-13 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410251311.OLEnaBoD-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=friedrich.vock@gmx.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.