From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719ED101C8 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 22:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729980388; cv=none; b=Np1SW1De5y8VLiKczrSOHMECPwSyuZbVkObtnGnA4707wnUo4IHAatXesTxR85y5zPCsKBo/lz8ZdbFkt9WeSM/ZEDlsNkf+ScDgKUKvFXDU/AZm+DJ/UmZK4FucqUo8bmDUfn0Uf99sbumeajviVGMkqX+pmmjdbuBoFLXq8nc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729980388; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tJRnf5YKlKvP5JZ4Vb3pOgCXRJIs/7aB3UJSv01zNQs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ILVmDqJ+Q+SQcZJy0HFFsYS3kM1b2BTUrDJTsMs0nfNAI8rL8CXz/R0E4B7ImTwv61nqIoGvnORFFwm6yZAivBxfRhtQ4JeAJilRzPVpBayJDHXe+nscqLnzDRKCTgDyPsVFJNrhRiFqzaxvCNtmKut7vFXu2aukcVF789wuF9U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jZ1B3nqj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jZ1B3nqj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729980386; x=1761516386; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=tJRnf5YKlKvP5JZ4Vb3pOgCXRJIs/7aB3UJSv01zNQs=; b=jZ1B3nqjXhXZM9O57Fm87UMnYCZeiJDNuF1WveHNXXwE9vlR62tt6AFb ZYRWsCg9OLrMW5XOAEVGfeEjY85SWCI91qMash2DcCyDYI34EDRZTxJw8 l0q17ejUnUHjY4gvZTR5MC4hkyFgfdYo0YFSgRcA/AcCuqUfdrgZSQ7IR jbGId6/XFoQA661fmxnlFyl4bKBJHVdj2YLJwN80Kt+lS3tFNeBvg4cbJ V5ne0JuqMlTMBvf5vZ9p5lPQwI2VWzxPg6CLDCQuthqivj89CdlaohVX9 n0eaUtJkCpK/oALfQOlkKw/Ukv/XMud7ZkcTdjAOLUpnVEUQsz/RTS2o3 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Vwf0t2jSRPeISI/0pKVPNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QLCWjTS4SSCa7AlYdYd6Tw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11237"; a="47111519" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,235,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="47111519" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2024 15:06:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yn9VnyELQ/qhODTx4S+PAw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ky6g/ynGRyWnZyyVEj2ZuA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,235,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="81287758" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2024 15:06:24 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t4ovO-000a5G-2W; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 22:06:22 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 06:05:24 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] futex: Create set_robust_list2 Message-ID: <202410270541.bvvhet1a-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241024145735.162090-2-andrealmeid@igalia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20241024145735.162090-2-andrealmeid@igalia.com> Hi André, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core] [also build test ERROR on tip/sched/core arnd-asm-generic/master linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241025] [cannot apply to tip/x86/asm] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andr-Almeida/futex-Create-set_robust_list2/20241024-231932 base: tip/locking/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024145735.162090-2-andrealmeid%40igalia.com patch subject: [PATCH RFC 1/1] futex: Create set_robust_list2 config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270541.bvvhet1a-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270541.bvvhet1a-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270541.bvvhet1a-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ./arch/openrisc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:464:16: error: 'sys_set_robust_list2' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'sys_set_robust_list'? 464 | __SYSCALL(463, sys_set_robust_list2) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/openrisc/kernel/sys_call_table.c:19:37: note: in definition of macro '__SYSCALL' 19 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call), | ^~~~ -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki