From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ecryptfs is unmaintained and untested
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:33:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241029043328.GB3213@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef98d985-6153-416d-9d5e-9a8a8595461a@app.fastmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:50:37PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 15:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > This comment has been there since June 2021, so I think we can just
> > delete ecryptfs now?
>
> I have no opinion on removing ecryptfs, but I don't how possibly
> removing it is related to the patch I sent, as far as I can tell
> it just means it relies on both CONFIG_BLOCK and CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD
> then.
>
> Is there any indication that the last users that had files on
> ecryptfs are unable to update their kernels?
Debian is still shipping ecryptfs-utils and is building and including
the ecryptfs kernel module in their distro kernel.`
So it seems likely that there are probably a non-zero (although
probably relatively small) number of ecryptfs users out there.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 14:18 [PATCH] eccryptfs: select CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-28 15:02 ` ecryptfs is unmaintained and untested Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-28 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-29 4:33 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2024-10-30 21:06 ` Tyler Hicks
2026-02-16 11:53 ` René Herman
2025-10-14 6:07 ` John Stultz
2025-10-14 14:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-10-14 16:38 ` John Stultz
2025-10-14 16:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-10-14 17:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-10-14 16:52 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-10-14 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-15 1:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-10-15 2:23 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241029043328.GB3213@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.