From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcsan, seqlock: Support seqcount_latch_t
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:48:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241030204815.GQ14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyFKUU1LpFfLrVXb@elver.google.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Something like this?
>
> ------ >8 ------
>
> Author: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 29 21:16:21 2024 +0100
>
> time/sched_clock: Swap update_clock_read_data() latch writes
>
> Swap the writes to the odd and even copies to make the writer critical
> section look like all other seqcount_latch writers.
>
> With that, we can also add the raw_write_seqcount_latch_end() to clearly
> denote the end of the writer section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> index 68d6c1190ac7..311c90a0e86e 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> @@ -119,9 +119,6 @@ unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(void)
> */
> static void update_clock_read_data(struct clock_read_data *rd)
> {
> - /* update the backup (odd) copy with the new data */
> - cd.read_data[1] = *rd;
> -
> /* steer readers towards the odd copy */
> raw_write_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
>
> @@ -130,6 +127,11 @@ static void update_clock_read_data(struct clock_read_data *rd)
>
> /* switch readers back to the even copy */
> raw_write_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
> +
> + /* update the backup (odd) copy with the new data */
> + cd.read_data[1] = *rd;
> +
> + raw_write_seqcount_latch_end(&cd.seq);
> }
>
> /*
That looks about right :-)
> ------ >8 ------
>
> I also noticed your d16317de9b41 ("seqlock/latch: Provide
> raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry()") to get rid of explicit instrumentation
> in noinstr.
>
> Not sure how to resolve that. We have that objtool support to erase
> calls in noinstr code (is_profiling_func), but that's x86 only.
>
> I could also make kcsan_atomic_next(0) noinstr compatible by checking if
> the ret IP is in noinstr, and immediately return if it is.
>
> Preferences?
Something like this perhaps?
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 5 +++--
include/linux/rbtree_latch.h | 14 ++++++++------
include/linux/seqlock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/printk/printk.c | 9 +++++----
kernel/time/sched_clock.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 ++++++----
6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index dfe6847fd99e..67aeaba4ba9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -174,10 +174,11 @@ static void __set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned long khz, int cpu, unsigned long long ts
c2n = per_cpu_ptr(&cyc2ns, cpu);
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&c2n->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&c2n->seq);
c2n->data[0] = data;
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&c2n->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&c2n->seq);
c2n->data[1] = data;
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&c2n->seq);
}
static void set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned long khz, int cpu, unsigned long long tsc_now)
diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h b/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
index 6a0999c26c7c..bc992c61b7ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
+++ b/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
@@ -145,10 +145,11 @@ latch_tree_insert(struct latch_tree_node *node,
struct latch_tree_root *root,
const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 0, ops->less);
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 1, ops->less);
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
}
/**
@@ -172,10 +173,11 @@ latch_tree_erase(struct latch_tree_node *node,
struct latch_tree_root *root,
const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 0);
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 1);
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
}
/**
@@ -204,9 +206,9 @@ latch_tree_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *root,
unsigned int seq;
do {
- seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
+ seq = read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
node = __lt_find(key, root, seq & 1, ops->comp);
- } while (raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
+ } while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
return node;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index fffeb754880f..9c2751087185 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -621,6 +621,12 @@ static __always_inline unsigned raw_read_seqcount_latch(const seqcount_latch_t *
return READ_ONCE(s->seqcount.sequence);
}
+static __always_inline unsigned read_seqcount_latch(const seqcount_latch_t *s)
+{
+ kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX);
+ return raw_read_seqcount_latch(s);
+}
+
/**
* raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry() - end a seqcount_latch_t read section
* @s: Pointer to seqcount_latch_t
@@ -635,6 +641,13 @@ raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(const seqcount_latch_t *s, unsigned start)
return unlikely(READ_ONCE(s->seqcount.sequence) != start);
}
+static __always_inline int
+read_seqcount_latch_retry(const seqcount_latch_t *s, unsigned start)
+{
+ kcsan_atomic_next(0);
+ return raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(s, start);
+}
+
/**
* raw_write_seqcount_latch() - redirect latch readers to even/odd copy
* @s: Pointer to seqcount_latch_t
@@ -716,13 +729,29 @@ raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(const seqcount_latch_t *s, unsigned start)
* When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU
* patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within.
*/
-static inline void raw_write_seqcount_latch(seqcount_latch_t *s)
+static __always_inline void raw_write_seqcount_latch(seqcount_latch_t *s)
{
smp_wmb(); /* prior stores before incrementing "sequence" */
s->seqcount.sequence++;
smp_wmb(); /* increment "sequence" before following stores */
}
+static __always_inline void write_seqcount_latch_begin(seqcount_latch_t *s)
+{
+ kcsan_nestable_atomic_begin();
+ raw_write_seqcount_latch(s);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void write_seqcount_latch(seqcount_latch_t *s)
+{
+ raw_write_seqcount_latch(s);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void write_seqcount_latch_end(seqcount_latch_t *s)
+{
+ kcsan_nestable_atomic_end();
+}
+
#define __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
{ \
.seqcount = SEQCNT_SPINLOCK_ZERO(lockname, &(lockname).lock), \
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index beb808f4c367..19911c8fa7b6 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -560,10 +560,11 @@ bool printk_percpu_data_ready(void)
/* Must be called under syslog_lock. */
static void latched_seq_write(struct latched_seq *ls, u64 val)
{
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&ls->latch);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&ls->latch);
ls->val[0] = val;
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&ls->latch);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&ls->latch);
ls->val[1] = val;
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&ls->latch);
}
/* Can be called from any context. */
@@ -574,10 +575,10 @@ static u64 latched_seq_read_nolock(struct latched_seq *ls)
u64 val;
do {
- seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&ls->latch);
+ seq = read_seqcount_latch(&ls->latch);
idx = seq & 0x1;
val = ls->val[idx];
- } while (raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(&ls->latch, seq));
+ } while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&ls->latch, seq));
return val;
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
index 68d6c1190ac7..4958b40ba6c9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
@@ -71,13 +71,13 @@ static __always_inline u64 cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
notrace struct clock_read_data *sched_clock_read_begin(unsigned int *seq)
{
- *seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
+ *seq = read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
return cd.read_data + (*seq & 1);
}
notrace int sched_clock_read_retry(unsigned int seq)
{
- return raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(&cd.seq, seq);
+ return read_seqcount_latch_retry(&cd.seq, seq);
}
unsigned long long noinstr sched_clock_noinstr(void)
@@ -102,7 +102,9 @@ unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(void)
{
unsigned long long ns;
preempt_disable_notrace();
+ kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX);
ns = sched_clock_noinstr();
+ kcsan_atomic_next(0);
preempt_enable_notrace();
return ns;
}
@@ -119,17 +121,19 @@ unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(void)
*/
static void update_clock_read_data(struct clock_read_data *rd)
{
- /* update the backup (odd) copy with the new data */
- cd.read_data[1] = *rd;
-
/* steer readers towards the odd copy */
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&cd.seq);
/* now its safe for us to update the normal (even) copy */
cd.read_data[0] = *rd;
/* switch readers back to the even copy */
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
+
+ /* update the backup (odd) copy with the new data */
+ cd.read_data[1] = *rd;
+
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&cd.seq);
}
/*
@@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ void __init generic_sched_clock_init(void)
*/
static u64 notrace suspended_sched_clock_read(void)
{
- unsigned int seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
+ unsigned int seq = read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
return cd.read_data[seq & 1].epoch_cyc;
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 7e6f409bf311..2ca26bfeb8f3 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -424,16 +424,18 @@ static void update_fast_timekeeper(const struct tk_read_base *tkr,
struct tk_read_base *base = tkf->base;
/* Force readers off to base[1] */
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch_begin(&tkf->seq);
/* Update base[0] */
memcpy(base, tkr, sizeof(*base));
/* Force readers back to base[0] */
- raw_write_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
+ write_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
/* Update base[1] */
memcpy(base + 1, base, sizeof(*base));
+
+ write_seqcount_latch_end(&tkf->seq);
}
static __always_inline u64 __ktime_get_fast_ns(struct tk_fast *tkf)
@@ -443,11 +445,11 @@ static __always_inline u64 __ktime_get_fast_ns(struct tk_fast *tkf)
u64 now;
do {
- seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
+ seq = read_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
tkr = tkf->base + (seq & 0x01);
now = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base);
now += __timekeeping_get_ns(tkr);
- } while (raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));
+ } while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));
return now;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 8:36 [PATCH] kcsan, seqlock: Support seqcount_latch_t Marco Elver
2024-10-29 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-29 13:05 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-29 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-29 20:49 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-30 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-10-31 7:00 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-31 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-31 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241030204815.GQ14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.