Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: increase SMC_WR_BUF_CNT

[Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>]

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:58:39 +0800
Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> >For some reason include/linux/wait.h does not offer a top level wrapper
> >macro for wait_event with interruptible, exclusive and timeout. I did
> >not spend too many cycles on thinking if that is even a combination that
> >makes sense (on the quick I don't see why not) and conversely I
> >refrained from making an attempt to accomplish the interruptible,
> >exclusive and timeout combo by using the abstraction-wise lower
> >level __wait_event interface.
> >
> >To alleviate the tx performance bottleneck and the CPU overhead due to
> >the spinlock contention, let us increase SMC_WR_BUF_CNT to 256.  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Have you tested other values, such as 64? In our internal version, we
> have used 64 for some time.

Yes we have, but I'm not sure the data is still to be found. Let me do
some digging.

> 
> Increasing this to 256 will require a 36K continuous physical memory
> allocation in smc_wr_alloc_link_mem(). Based on my experience, this may
> fail on servers that have been running for a long time and have
> fragmented memory.

Good point! It is possible that I did not give sufficient thought to
this aspect.

Regards,
Halil