From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kaixuxia@tencent.com, frankjpliu@tencent.com, kasong@tencent.com,
sagazchen@tencent.com, kernelxing@tencent.com,
aurelianliu@tencent.com, deshengwu@tencent.com,
flyingpeng@tencent.com, jingqunli@tencent.com,
jason.zeng@intel.com, wu.zheng@intel.com, yingbao.jia@intel.com,
pei.p.jia@intel.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [opencloudos:next 12024/13046] block/blk-wbt.c:1016:70: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:53:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411010756.CWiLppSb-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git next
head: ce9f9d823a41831d622fa11e29c3d620c044f51b
commit: 3796036b9f46addfd1485d7ebecff5da4fc9cb27 [12024/13046] rue/io: introduce wbt class for cgroup priority
config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411010756.CWiLppSb-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411010756.CWiLppSb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411010756.CWiLppSb-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> block/blk-wbt.c:1016:70: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long rw @@ got restricted blk_opf_t [usertype] opf @@
block/blk-wbt.c:1016:70: sparse: expected unsigned long rw
block/blk-wbt.c:1016:70: sparse: got restricted blk_opf_t [usertype] opf
>> block/blk-wbt.c:870:19: sparse: sparse: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer
block/blk-wbt.c:870:35: sparse: sparse: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer
block/blk-wbt.c:872:18: sparse: sparse: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer
block/blk-wbt.c:874:23: sparse: sparse: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer
vim +1016 block/blk-wbt.c
862
863 static inline unsigned int throtl_info_get_limit(struct wbt_throtl_info *ti,
864 unsigned long rw)
865 {
866 unsigned int limit;
867
868 if (!throtl_info_enabled(ti))
869 return UINT_MAX;
> 870 if ((rw & REQ_OP_MASK) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
871 return ti->wb_background;
872 if (rw & REQ_HIPRIO || current_is_kswapd())
873 limit = ti->max_depth;
874 else if (rw & REQ_BACKGROUND)
875 limit = ti->wb_background;
876 else
877 limit = ti->wb_normal;
878
879 return limit;
880 }
881
882 static void throtl_info_rqw_done(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct wbt_throtl_info *ti,
883 struct rq_wait *rqw, enum wbt_flags wbt_acct)
884 {
885 int inflight, limit;
886
887 if (!(wbt_acct & WBT_CLASS_TRACKED))
888 return;
889
890 inflight = atomic_dec_return(&rqw->inflight);
891
892 if (!throtl_info_enabled(ti)) {
893 throtl_info_wake_all(ti);
894 return;
895 }
896
897 if (wbt_acct & WBT_DISCARD)
898 limit = ti->wb_background;
899 else
900 limit = ti->wb_normal;
901
902 /*
903 * Don't wake anyone up if we are above the normal limit.
904 */
905 if (inflight && inflight >= limit)
906 return;
907
908 if (wq_has_sleeper(&rqw->wait)) {
909 int diff = limit - inflight;
910
911 if (!inflight || diff >= ti->wb_background / 2)
912 wake_up_nr(&rqw->wait, diff);
913 }
914 }
915
916 static void wbt_class_timer_fn(struct timer_list *t)
917 {
918 struct rq_wb *rwb = from_timer(rwb, t, wbt_class_timer);
919 struct wbt_throtl_info *ti;
920 u64 rd_expired_cnt;
921 int highest_class = WBT_CLASS_NR;
922 int i;
923
924 for (i = 0; i < WBT_CLASS_NR; i++) {
925 ti = rwb_to_wbt_class_info(rwb, i);
926 rd_expired_cnt = atomic64_read(&ti->read_expired_cnt);
927 atomic64_set(&ti->read_expired_cnt, 0);
928
929 if (rd_expired_cnt && highest_class == WBT_CLASS_NR)
930 highest_class = i;
931 }
932
933 if (highest_class == WBT_CLASS_NR)
934 goto depth_scale_up;
935
936 /*expired read did happen!!! throttle from the lowest class*/
937 for (i = WBT_CLASS_NR - 1; i >= highest_class; i--) {
938 struct wbt_throtl_info *throtl_ti =
939 rwb_to_wbt_class_info(rwb, i);
940
941 if (!throtl_info_enabled(throtl_ti))
942 continue;
943
944 /*skip if can't be scaled down*/
945 if (!RUE_CALL_TYPE(IO, throtl_info_scale_down, bool, throtl_ti, true))
946 continue;
947
948 /*current_depth changed, recal wb_normal and wb_background */
949 RUE_CALL_VOID(IO, throtl_info_calc_limit, throtl_ti);
950
951 if (throtl_info_inflight(throtl_ti) >
952 throtl_ti->wb_background) {
953 /*
954 * we did throttle some buffer write,
955 * go and observe the effect
956 */
957 break;
958 }
959 }
960 goto out;
961
962 depth_scale_up:
963 /*amazing!!! everything goes fine, try to scale up queue depth*/
964 for (i = 0; i < WBT_CLASS_NR; i++) {
965 struct wbt_throtl_info *ti = rwb_to_wbt_class_info(rwb, i);
966
967 if (ti->current_depth < ti->max_depth) {
968 if (RUE_CALL_TYPE(IO, throtl_info_scale_up, bool, ti, false)) {
969 RUE_CALL_VOID(IO, throtl_info_calc_limit, ti);
970 throtl_info_wake_all(ti);
971 goto out;
972 }
973 }
974 }
975
976 out:
977 for (i = 0; i < WBT_CLASS_NR; i++) {
978 ti = rwb_to_wbt_class_info(rwb, i);
979 if (throtl_info_inflight(ti) ||
980 ti->current_depth < ti->max_depth) {
981 mod_timer(t, jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies(rwb->win_nsec));
982 break;
983 }
984 }
985 }
986
987 static void wbt_class_account_bio_begin(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct bio *bio)
988 {
989 int i;
990 enum wbt_flags flags;
991 struct wbt_throtl_info *ti = bio_to_wbt_class_info(rwb, bio);
992
993 flags = bio_to_wbt_class_flags(bio);
994 if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_READ)
995 atomic64_inc(&ti->read_cnt);
996
997 if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE &&
998 (bio->bi_opf & (REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE)) == (REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE))
999 atomic64_inc(&ti->direct_write_cnt);
1000
1001 if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC) &&
1002 !(bio->bi_opf & REQ_IDLE))
1003 atomic64_inc(&ti->wr_sync_cnt);
1004
1005 if (flags & WBT_CLASS_TRACKED) {
1006 i = wbt_flags_to_counter_idx(flags);
1007 atomic64_inc(&ti->tracked_cnt[i]);
1008 }
1009 }
1010
1011 static bool wbt_class_inflight_cb(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data)
1012 {
1013 struct wbt_wait_data *data = private_data;
1014
1015 return rq_wait_inc_below(rqw,
> 1016 throtl_info_get_limit(data->ti, data->opf));
1017 }
1018
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411010756.CWiLppSb-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aurelianliu@tencent.com \
--cc=deshengwu@tencent.com \
--cc=flyingpeng@tencent.com \
--cc=frankjpliu@tencent.com \
--cc=jason.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=jingqunli@tencent.com \
--cc=kaixuxia@tencent.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pei.p.jia@intel.com \
--cc=sagazchen@tencent.com \
--cc=wu.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=yingbao.jia@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.