From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lichtman.org (lichtman.org [149.28.33.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71BEA13AD05 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=149.28.33.109 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730486551; cv=none; b=QhLQZhjPgILGHPav4KpwtpZpZIrdqACk+f7WXqb93IUXv6yC7USt12s8qlV8xQvBHh6RvF2zb9DX1IVlpulZ7Towa4qeeAn3G4UzDoyRJdMlIsuBJXkyLEoFpqN8PvF4xrO6Hj6WmXUZ+0A0QxwRmxRGu2EyiBE5V1Yxoa4QYBM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730486551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HisETPZ7/4XpVnNzLz04dlXQEaup4n8C1uRrnmDa+O8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DyUwEAcPVV8yxjR/L4/8J4wiNI/O+sVeNPO9ws4zk0lmbT50KEWNjT1jpZxPDRZqKLaanaD+KDwmEUNpM2YEDtUqbf+JctFYWImn8IfuXd1FV1Syn94U+S41iS1/eCup4nVqPoPVHRG+M8avfqgb0SahmghZnEB3JuVsGd8EsAM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtman.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtman.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lichtman.org header.i=@lichtman.org header.b=V0bIjAFx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=149.28.33.109 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtman.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtman.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lichtman.org header.i=@lichtman.org header.b="V0bIjAFx" Received: by lichtman.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E2441770C1; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lichtman.org; s=mail; t=1730486548; bh=HisETPZ7/4XpVnNzLz04dlXQEaup4n8C1uRrnmDa+O8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V0bIjAFxKO+e0T5ujGJdU12J6UCn5I69bfzDQvfAAHs4SWyPzMAgAUA0W++siRjqq L/jIR9zNdXhbJoqt98VIQC419AQ/KDT6WDrhUVCjpZT2/FCOIB9cA/f9OVyPrFUpMP yQ1P2qZN+DIU5EordV512uZ2zMC78eO7jQI3zlMVWY8FMkEG6GSzJ42sEdFCQYTNGO hqqHV2+jL2kR+WMgj9A6TCHbThrSExxNIoIHixJhl0W55Vb197zicj8og09G60bAli Blzfpj3oDgWOYVMmBVMWvKGvqg6E4yJ7jqtJtT2W8/YATu0BdT1lsID0N0IhY52nh8 CLHA0jrMgBWLw== Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:42:28 +0000 From: Nir Lichtman To: Daniel Thompson Cc: Steven Rostedt , Doug Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Yuran Pereira Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 03/11] kdb: Replace the use of simple_strto with safer kstrto in kdb_main Message-ID: <20241101184228.GA38763@lichtman.org> References: <20241101103647.011707614@goodmis.org> <20241101103707.290109005@goodmis.org> <20241101103128.46faf14d@gandalf.local.home> <20241101182204.GA752705@aspen.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241101182204.GA752705@aspen.lan> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:22:04PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 10:31:28AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:21:05 -0700 > > Doug Anderson wrote: > > > > > FWIW, I personally have no objection to this patch and patch #3/3 in > > > Nir's series (#5/11 in your email thread) going through the ftrace > > > tree, I'm not actually the maintainer of kdb/kgdb. I'm a reviewer and > > > I try my best to help, but officially you should probably have Daniel > > > Thompson's Ack for them. ...or at least make sure he's CCed here > > > saying that you've picked them up. > > > > > > I've added him to the conversation here. > > > > Sure, I can even drop this patch if need be. Thanks for adding Daniel to > > the Cc. I probably should have run these patches through get maintainers to > > make sure everyone was accounted for. > > > I presume the tracing tree is involved because one of them changes the > kdb ftrace command? Are there dependencies between that and other > patches in the seriesm? I assume that is the reason, I just used the same recipient list that the original author of the patch series used a couple of months ago. The patch series is mostly around migrating to usage of better string to int conversion functions, so technically each change is not really dependant on the others. BTW, Thanks for the reviews Doug and for applying Steven. Nir. > > > Daniel.