All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/10] bpf: Support private stack for struct_ops progs
Date: Mon,  4 Nov 2024 11:35:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104193542.3245367-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104193455.3241859-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

For struct_ops progs, whether a particular prog will use private stack
or not (prog->aux->use_priv_stack) will be set before actual insn-level
verification for that prog. One particular implementation is to
piggyback on struct_ops->check_member(). The next patch will have an
example for this. The struct_ops->check_member() will set
prog->aux->use_priv_stack to be true which enables private stack
usage with ignoring BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE limit.

If use_priv_stack is true for a particular struct_ops prog, bpf
trampoline will need to do recursion checks (one level at this point)
to avoid stack overwrite. A field (recursion_detected()) is added to
bpf_prog_aux structure such that if bpf_prog->aux->recursion_detected
is set by the struct_ops subsystem, the function will be called
to report an error, collect related info, etc.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |  1 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c      |  4 ++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8a3ea7440a4a..d04f990dd6d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1528,6 +1528,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	u64 prog_array_member_cnt; /* counts how many times as member of prog_array */
 	struct mutex ext_mutex; /* mutex for is_extended and prog_array_member_cnt */
 	struct bpf_arena *arena;
+	void (*recursion_detected)(struct bpf_prog *prog); /* callback if recursion is detected */
 	/* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
 	const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
 	/* function name for valid attach_btf_id */
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e921589abc72..f65431c42f9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -891,6 +891,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_prog_check_recur(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
 		return prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_ITER;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
+		return prog->aux->use_priv_stack;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 9f36c049f4c2..a8d188b31da5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tram
 
 	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(prog);
+		if (prog->aux->recursion_detected)
+			prog->aux->recursion_detected(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return bpf_prog_start_time();
@@ -975,6 +977,8 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(prog);
+		if (prog->aux->recursion_detected)
+			prog->aux->recursion_detected(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return bpf_prog_start_time();
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 03ae76d57076..ee16c328dffc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ static enum priv_stack_mode bpf_enable_priv_stack(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	if (!bpf_prog_check_recur(prog))
 		return NO_PRIV_STACK;
 
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
+		return PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS;
 
 	return PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE;
 }
@@ -6118,7 +6120,8 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
 					idx, subprog_depth);
 				return -EACCES;
 			}
-			if (subprog_depth >= BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE) {
+			if (priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS ||
+			    subprog_depth >= BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE) {
 				subprog[idx].use_priv_stack = true;
 				subprog[idx].visited_with_priv_stack = true;
 			}
@@ -6235,6 +6238,11 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		for (int i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
 			if (!si[i].has_tail_call)
 				continue;
+			if (priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS) {
+				verbose(env,
+					"Private stack not supported due to tail call\n");
+				return -EACCES;
+			}
 			priv_stack_supported = NO_PRIV_STACK;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -6275,6 +6283,11 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				depth_frame, subtree_depth);
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
+		if (orig_priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS) {
+			verbose(env,
+				"Private stack not supported due to possible nested subprog run\n");
+			return -EACCES;
+		}
 		if (orig_priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE) {
 			for (int i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
 				si[i].use_priv_stack = false;
@@ -21950,6 +21963,11 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (prog->aux->use_priv_stack && !bpf_jit_supports_private_stack()) {
+		verbose(env, "Private stack not supported by jit\n");
+		return -EACCES;
+	}
+
 	/* btf_ctx_access() used this to provide argument type info */
 	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info =
 		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].info;
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04 19:34 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/10] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/10] bpf: Check stack depth limit after visiting all subprogs Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/10] bpf: Return false for bpf_prog_check_recur() default case Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:21   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  1:35     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:55       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  2:53         ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  3:50           ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  4:28             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  6:02               ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 15:50                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 16:33                   ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 16:38                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 16:48                       ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 17:47                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/10] bpf: Allow private stack to have each subprog having stack size of 512 bytes Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  2:47   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:09     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/10] bpf: Check potential private stack recursion for progs with async callback Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  2:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:37     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 20:26       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 21:26         ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 21:52           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06  0:19             ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06  1:07               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06  2:33                 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06  6:55                 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06 15:26                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06 15:44                     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/10] bpf: Allocate private stack for eligible main prog or subprogs Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:07     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  3:44       ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  5:19         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  6:05           ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/10] bpf, x86: Avoid repeated usage of bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] bpf, x86: Support private stack in jit Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add tracing prog private stack tests Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops " Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241104193542.3245367-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.