[merged mm-stable] mm-dont-set-readahead-flag-on-a-folio-when-lookahead_size-nr_to_read.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: don't set readahead flag on a folio when lookahead_size > nr_to_read
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-dont-set-readahead-flag-on-a-folio-when-lookahead_size-nr_to_read.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Subject: mm: don't set readahead flag on a folio when lookahead_size > nr_to_read
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:23:42 +0200

The readahead flag is set on a folio based on the lookahead_size and
nr_to_read.  For example, when the readahead happens from index to index +
nr_to_read, then the readahead `mark` offset from index is set at
nr_to_read - lookahead_size.

There are some scenarios where the lookahead_size > nr_to_read.  For
example, readahead window was created, but the file was truncated before
the readahead starts.  do_page_cache_ra() will clamp the nr_to_read if the
readahead window extends beyond EOF after truncation.  If this happens,
readahead flag should not be set on any folio on the current readahead
window.

The current calculation for `mark` with mapping_min_order > 0 gives
incorrect results when lookahead_size > nr_to_read due to rounding up
operation:

index = 128
nr_to_read = 16
lookahead_size = 28
mapping_min_order = 4 (16 pages)

ra_folio_index = round_up(128 + 16 - 28, 16) = 128;
mark = 128 - 128 = 0; # offset from index to set RA flag

In the above example, the lookahead_size is actually lying outside the
current readahead window.  Without this patch, RA flag will be set
incorrectly on the folio at index 128.  This can lead to marking the
readahead flag on the wrong folio, therefore, triggering a readahead when
it is not necessary.

Explicitly initialize `mark` to be ULONG_MAX and only calculate it when
lookahead_size is within the readahead window.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241017062342.478973-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com
Fixes: 26cfdb395eef ("readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead")
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/readahead.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/readahead.c~mm-dont-set-readahead-flag-on-a-folio-when-lookahead_size-nr_to_read
+++ a/mm/readahead.c
@@ -206,9 +206,9 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct read
 		unsigned long nr_to_read, unsigned long lookahead_size)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
-	unsigned long ra_folio_index, index = readahead_index(ractl);
+	unsigned long index = readahead_index(ractl);
 	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
-	unsigned long mark, i = 0;
+	unsigned long mark = ULONG_MAX, i = 0;
 	unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
 
 	/*
@@ -232,9 +232,14 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct read
 	 * index that only has lookahead or "async_region" to set the
 	 * readahead flag.
 	 */
-	ra_folio_index = round_up(readahead_index(ractl) + nr_to_read - lookahead_size,
-				  min_nrpages);
-	mark = ra_folio_index - index;
+	if (lookahead_size <= nr_to_read) {
+		unsigned long ra_folio_index;
+
+		ra_folio_index = round_up(readahead_index(ractl) +
+					  nr_to_read - lookahead_size,
+					  min_nrpages);
+		mark = ra_folio_index - index;
+	}
 	nr_to_read += readahead_index(ractl) - index;
 	ractl->_index = index;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from p.raghav@samsung.com are