From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,willy@infradead.org,laoar.shao@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [to-be-updated] mm-readahead-fix-large-folio-support-in-async-readahead.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:11:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241107201130.0DDF6C4CECC@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/readahead: fix large folio support in async readahead
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-readahead-fix-large-folio-support-in-async-readahead.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: mm/readahead: fix large folio support in async readahead
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:21:14 +0800
When testing large folio support with XFS on our servers, we observed that
only a few large folios are mapped when reading large files via mmap.
After a thorough analysis, I identified it was caused by the
`/sys/block/*/queue/read_ahead_kb` setting. On our test servers, this
parameter is set to 128KB. After I tune it to 2MB, the large folio can
work as expected. However, I believe the large folio behavior should not
be dependent on the value of read_ahead_kb. It would be more robust if
the kernel can automatically adopt to it.
With `/sys/block/*/queue/read_ahead_kb` set to a non-2MB aligned size,
this issue can be verified with a simple test case, as shown below:
#define LEN (1024 * 1024 * 1024) // 1GB file
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *addr;
int fd, i;
fd = open("data", O_RDWR);
if (fd < 0) {
perror("open");
exit(-1);
}
addr = mmap(NULL, LEN, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
exit(-1);
}
if (madvise(addr, LEN, MADV_HUGEPAGE)) {
perror("madvise");
exit(-1);
}
for (i = 0; i < LEN / 4096; i++)
memset(addr + i * 4096, 1, 1);
while (1) {} // Verifiable with /proc/meminfo
munmap(addr, LEN);
close(fd);
exit(0);
}
When large folio support is enabled and read_ahead_kb is set to a smaller
value, ra->size (4MB) may exceed the maximum allowed size (e.g., 128KB).
To address this, we need to add a conditional check for such cases.
However, this alone is insufficient, as users might set read_ahead_kb to a
larger, non-hugepage-aligned value (e.g., 4MB + 128KB). In these
instances, it is essential to explicitly align ra->size with the hugepage
size.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241106092114.8408-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Fixes: 4687fdbb805a ("mm/filemap: Support VM_HUGEPAGE for file mappings")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/readahead.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/readahead.c~mm-readahead-fix-large-folio-support-in-async-readahead
+++ a/mm/readahead.c
@@ -390,6 +390,8 @@ static unsigned long get_next_ra_size(st
return 4 * cur;
if (cur <= max / 2)
return 2 * cur;
+ if (cur > max)
+ return cur;
return max;
}
@@ -647,7 +649,7 @@ void page_cache_async_ra(struct readahea
1UL << order);
if (index == expected) {
ra->start += ra->size;
- ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages);
+ ra->size = ALIGN(get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages), 1 << order);
ra->async_size = ra->size;
goto readit;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from laoar.shao@gmail.com are
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-07 20:11 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-16 5:24 [to-be-updated] mm-readahead-fix-large-folio-support-in-async-readahead.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241107201130.0DDF6C4CECC@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.