From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689BAD5E149 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269A610E93C; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="h6zJ/Xvu"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7B010E1A4; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4288BA44E0C; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B732C4CECD; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:49:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1731055763; bh=l9sY1OHDO8wFIDCdzrR2/15Yw7PfigB1KCl3QZf41FE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h6zJ/XvuS7XXzK1Ct5OUSBE+f1pvTtZzKmi7E9ki5m3c0wZAT7xt5nOmJzLFRMGNY Ld60VNZ7EaU6PNpU114MBwrJ7l5r3qTSh/g9uSENTzgWcRQMo2pXbdyqaP1hbYcSxV lhRQqCJ8QApvyOAZUtineIyvF2vB32SnxBsUb//A= Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:49:20 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Fedor Pchelkin Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alex Deucher , Harry Wentland , Leo Li , Rodrigo Siqueira , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , "Pan, Xinhui" , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Fangzhi Zuo , Wayne Lin , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, Alexey Khoroshilov , Mario Limonciello , Jonathan Gray Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process Message-ID: <2024110803-undermine-viewable-2605@gregkh> References: <20241029133141.45335-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <20241029-3ca95c1f41e96c39faf2e49a-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <20241104-61da90a19c561bb5ed63141b-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <2024110521-mummify-unloved-4f5d@gregkh> <20241108-267fb65587d32642092cea40-pchelkin@ispras.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108-267fb65587d32642092cea40-pchelkin@ispras.ru> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 08:59:24 +0000 X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 11:41:18AM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On Tue, 05. Nov 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:55:28PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > It is just strange that the (exact same) change made by the commits is > > > duplicated by backporting tools. As it is not the first case where DRM > > > patches are involved per Greg's statement [1], I wonder if something can be > > > done on stable-team's side to avoid such odd behavior in future. > > > > No, all of this mess needs to be fixed up on the drm developer's side, > > they are the ones doing this type of crazy "let's commit the same patch > > to multiple branches and then reference a commit that will show up at an > > unknown time in the future and hope for the best!" workflow. > > > > I'm amazed it works at all, they get to keep fixing up this mess as this > > is entirely self-inflicted. > > Thanks for reply, I get your remark. DRM people are mostly CC'ed here, > hopefully it won't be that difficult to tune their established workflow to > make the stable process easier and more straightforward. > > As of now, would you mind to take the revert for 6.1? It's [PATCH 1/1] in > this thread. No point to keep it there, and the duplicated commits were > already reverted from the fresher stable kernels. > I don't see it in my review queue anymore, can you please resend it? thanks, greg k-h