From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB065215F58 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731012213; cv=none; b=tZ11HvTpNItWl8r2p+UyU7gU7BINiwATUan7NvG6cYJDSxWWQ8/XlSShcwayIJtgrTa9H+QedG0qeGx4QKoUlyhimVdmMEUMVVWEtcm32qVfEwmS0/ZxSNqzc4BK3JY/uzU4D4oh1Nj3CUsuJZB8hlYfh5z05hAZyxQ7qX05Dlo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731012213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fCgLs81zi2LfH0P/Z5cGElofbjlU0Ldr//YjmNgzJ0Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FutyIqlG1849C99TMru7Fls6beuO6SrHG5hhBE9PgdtAkjoU5i9F2D5RxXtdpiUl/CPAjAayIOFwMif9kM8kuIZRRJZE0Y52hltQfEPPvDv2XqyUvNNTSmYhPGpffXDJUsPcuQZDSkgerX7pXHL8fqbiZzCLq4QJIfsqvCmsXA8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=SYBZkN3e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="SYBZkN3e" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731012212; x=1762548212; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fCgLs81zi2LfH0P/Z5cGElofbjlU0Ldr//YjmNgzJ0Q=; b=SYBZkN3eiEn0p+WJOMWrCk8/ZU5sE69jGZY6m4BBTJWywCsjvTRVw+wL ujO3kXzN4Nw8jCOMu1EFZ3TgPpUxnX9XRg5+e8DQlYRGJHFaWjsBeYJHX dV1AiE4ZSnRPO5OuFQgzECl2dMmS2jMmPrjZS8ffMJnXcUYdvf30aElqT LHpCiqZZcKsy36PvAV0BEtQUZpd6l1dPtxNvy1mmcVrp+I5VIzHL4CpbC 04TWKHZQflcu4r4yGN5keixdzcaWAJOlEjGvu+lBexHkRv2gnoDFBAo5I Ww7mkW6ndqPQduQri4VdJ9UvBV/nTQVnGhbU60n9laeycwmWy0Nl8oAwv A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8aadDUi9QGK677osJOEfTA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1SOU5X2oQPSwacKuj+8MKg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11249"; a="33726345" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,136,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="33726345" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2024 12:43:31 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: d8FLf5tXTsC8ye+fbhC0QQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TXmCDPDSSROkWZvz6yvy/g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,136,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="84750665" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2024 12:43:30 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t99Lk-000qeo-1q; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:43:28 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 04:43:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dave Hansen Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/cpu/bugs: Consider having old Intel microcode to be a vulnerability Message-ID: <202411080414.LOARJjiX-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241107170630.2A92B8D3@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241107170630.2A92B8D3@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com> Hi Dave, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/smp/core] [also build test ERROR on tip/x86/core] [cannot apply to tip/master driver-core/driver-core-testing driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus tip/auto-latest linus/master v6.12-rc6 next-20241107] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dave-Hansen/x86-cpu-bugs-Consider-having-old-Intel-microcode-to-be-a-vulnerability/20241108-011145 base: tip/smp/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107170630.2A92B8D3%40davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com patch subject: [RFC][PATCH] x86/cpu/bugs: Consider having old Intel microcode to be a vulnerability config: x86_64-rhel-8.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080414.LOARJjiX-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080414.LOARJjiX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411080414.LOARJjiX-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1321: >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel-ucode-defs.h:2:1: error: expected '}' before '{' token 2 | { .flags = X86_CPU_ID_FLAG_ENTRY_VALID, .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, .family = 0x6, .model = 0x05, .steppings = 0x0001, .driver_data = 0x45 } | ^ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1320:44: note: to match this '{' 1320 | struct x86_cpu_id cpu_latest_microcdoe[] = { | ^ vim +2 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel-ucode-defs.h > 2 { .flags = X86_CPU_ID_FLAG_ENTRY_VALID, .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, .family = 0x6, .model = 0x05, .steppings = 0x0001, .driver_data = 0x45 } -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki