From: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:15:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72nyWAhyORsDij6P6U7Ww=eCp6S=LzPWZN4wxGD8JiK+RQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:28:53 +0100
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 9:16 AM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > moment only the patches up to introducing the new `ffi::` crate (which
> > includes most of the changes), i.e. up to commit d072acda4862 ("rust:
> > use custom FFI integer types") but without doing the big remapping
> > just yet, so that others have it available for their branches, and
>
> "without doing the big remapping" is ambiguous -- I meant "actual
> remapping", i.e. taking the commit as-is without the next commit,
> since we should be able to do most of the renames already.
That sounds reasonable to me. So for next cycles we have a commit that
fixes up remaining renames, and then apply the other commits?
Best,
Gary
>
> But the other interpretation, i.e. skipping most of the
> changes/renames `core` -> `ffi` in that commit and do those later when
> we do the actual remapping (which is most of the changes, in fact), is
> also fine. They are not needed right away.
>
> I will check how it would look like on top of next.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 6:58 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-11 8:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 8:28 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 14:15 ` Gary Guo [this message]
2024-11-11 23:08 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 23:58 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-12 1:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12 6:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12 8:50 ` Miguel Ojeda
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-17 8:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-17 11:19 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-17 14:51 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-17 15:37 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-17 16:11 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-24 7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-24 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 11:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:29 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:14 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:16 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:24 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:29 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-27 9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-27 10:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12 9:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 11:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:29 ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 13:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:52 ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 15:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 15:27 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 15:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-17 22:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 23:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 11:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 23:47 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-19 9:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19 9:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-10 9:28 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-10 9:41 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:07 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:08 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-16 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 10:59 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2024-12-16 16:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 19:46 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2021-09-28 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 4:18 ` Gary Guo
2021-09-28 5:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-29 17:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-29 17:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo \
--to=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.