From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:37:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112143711.21239-2-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112143711.21239-1-frederic@kernel.org>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
The rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function is no longer used, so this commit
removes it.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 1 -
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 30 ------------------------------
3 files changed, 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 0ee270b3f5ed..fe42315f667f 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ static inline bool rcu_inkernel_boot_has_ended(void) { return true; }
static inline bool rcu_is_watching(void) { return true; }
static inline void rcu_momentary_eqs(void) { }
static inline void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) { }
-static inline bool rcu_gp_might_be_stalled(void) { return false; }
/* Avoid RCU read-side critical sections leaking across. */
static inline void rcu_all_qs(void) { barrier(); }
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 90a684f94776..27d86d912781 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void);
void rcu_barrier(void);
void rcu_momentary_eqs(void);
void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void);
-bool rcu_gp_might_be_stalled(void);
struct rcu_gp_oldstate {
unsigned long rgos_norm;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
index 4432db6d0b99..d7cdd535e50b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
@@ -76,36 +76,6 @@ int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check);
-/**
- * rcu_gp_might_be_stalled - Is it likely that the grace period is stalled?
- *
- * Returns @true if the current grace period is sufficiently old that
- * it is reasonable to assume that it might be stalled. This can be
- * useful when deciding whether to allocate memory to enable RCU-mediated
- * freeing on the one hand or just invoking synchronize_rcu() on the other.
- * The latter is preferable when the grace period is stalled.
- *
- * Note that sampling of the .gp_start and .gp_seq fields must be done
- * carefully to avoid false positives at the beginnings and ends of
- * grace periods.
- */
-bool rcu_gp_might_be_stalled(void)
-{
- unsigned long d = rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check() / RCU_STALL_MIGHT_DIV;
- unsigned long j = jiffies;
-
- if (d < RCU_STALL_MIGHT_MIN)
- d = RCU_STALL_MIGHT_MIN;
- smp_mb(); // jiffies before .gp_seq to avoid false positives.
- if (!rcu_gp_in_progress())
- return false;
- // Long delays at this point avoids false positive, but a delay
- // of ULONG_MAX/4 jiffies voids your no-false-positive warranty.
- smp_mb(); // .gp_seq before second .gp_start
- // And ditto here.
- return !time_before(j, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_start) + d);
-}
-
/* Don't do RCU CPU stall warnings during long sysrq printouts. */
void rcu_sysrq_start(void)
{
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 14:37 [PATCH 0/3] RCU stall for v6.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-11-12 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks() Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112143711.21239-2-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.