All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com,
	Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 07/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add uc_skey VM test case
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:23:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112162536.144980-8-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112162536.144980-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

From: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>

Add a test case manipulating s390 storage keys from within the ucontrol
VM.

Storage key instruction (ISKE, SSKE and RRBE) intercepts and
Keyless-subset facility are disabled on first use, where the skeys are
setup by KVM in non ucontrol VMs.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108091620.289406-1-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
[frankja@linux.ibm.com: Fixed patch prefix]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20241108091620.289406-1-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h   |   6 +
 .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
index 481bd2fd6a32..33fef6fd9617 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
@@ -32,4 +32,10 @@ static inline void cpu_relax(void)
 	barrier();
 }
 
+/* Get the instruction length */
+static inline int insn_length(unsigned char code)
+{
+	return ((((int)code + 64) >> 7) + 1) << 1;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 3e649b12a0b9..ad95087cc74c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -79,6 +79,33 @@ asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
 	"	j	0b\n"
 );
 
+/* Test program manipulating storage keys */
+extern char test_skey_asm[];
+asm("test_skey_asm:\n"
+	"xgr	%r0, %r0\n"
+
+	"0:\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	st	%r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+
+	"	iske	%r1,%r6\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	diag	0,0,0x44\n"
+
+	"	sske	%r1,%r6\n"
+	"	xgr	%r1,%r1\n"
+	"	iske	%r1,%r6\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	diag	0,0,0x44\n"
+
+	"	rrbe	%r1,%r6\n"
+	"	iske	%r1,%r6\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	diag	0,0,0x44\n"
+
+	"	j	0b\n"
+);
+
 FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
@@ -298,8 +325,50 @@ static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
 	}
 }
 
-/* verify SIEIC exit
+/*
+ * Handle the SIEIC exit
  * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
+ */
+static void uc_skey_enable(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+
+	/* disable KSS */
+	sie_block->cpuflags &= ~CPUSTAT_KSS;
+	/* disable skey inst interception */
+	sie_block->ictl &= ~(ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the instruction intercept
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
+ */
+static bool uc_handle_insn_ic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+	int ilen = insn_length(sie_block->ipa >> 8);
+	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+
+	switch (run->s390_sieic.ipa) {
+	case 0xB229: /* ISKE */
+	case 0xB22b: /* SSKE */
+	case 0xB22a: /* RRBE */
+		uc_skey_enable(self);
+
+		/* rewind to reexecute intercepted instruction */
+		run->psw_addr = run->psw_addr - ilen;
+		pr_info("rewind guest addr to 0x%.16llx\n", run->psw_addr);
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the SIEIC exit
+ * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
  */
 static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
 {
@@ -315,7 +384,10 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
 	case ICPT_INST:
 		/* end execution in caller on intercepted instruction */
 		pr_info("sie instruction interception\n");
-		return false;
+		return uc_handle_insn_ic(self);
+	case ICPT_KSS:
+		uc_skey_enable(self);
+		return true;
 	case ICPT_OPEREXC:
 		/* operation exception */
 		TEST_FAIL("sie exception on %.4x%.8x", sie_block->ipa, sie_block->ipb);
@@ -472,4 +544,73 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
 	ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
 }
 
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+	struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
+	u64 test_vaddr = VM_MEM_SIZE - (SZ_1M / 2);
+	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+	const u8 skeyvalue = 0x34;
+
+	/* copy test_skey_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
+	TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
+	       &test_skey_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
+	memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_skey_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	/* set register content for test_skey_asm to access not mapped memory */
+	sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+	sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
+	sync_regs->gprs[6] = test_vaddr;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+
+	/* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
+	run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+	run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+
+	/* ISKE */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+
+	/*
+	 * Bail out and skip the test after uc_skey_enable was executed but iske
+	 * is still intercepted. Instructions are not handled by the kernel.
+	 * Thus there is no need to test this here.
+	 */
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->cpuflags & CPUSTAT_KSS);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->ictl & (ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE));
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC, self->run->exit_reason);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ICPT_INST, sie_block->icptcode);
+	TEST_REQUIRE(sie_block->ipa != 0xb229);
+
+	/* ISKE contd. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	/* assert initial skey (ACC = 0, R & C = 1) */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0x06, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+	uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+	/* SSKE + ISKE */
+	sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+	uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+	/* RRBE + ISKE */
+	sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(4, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	/* assert R reset but rest of skey unchanged */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue & 0xfa, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, sync_regs->gprs[1] & 0x04);
+	uc_assert_diag44(self);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 16:23 [GIT PULL 00/14] KVM: s390: pull requests for 6.13 Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 01/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for SORTL and DFLTCC CPU subfunctions Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 02/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for PRNO, KDSA and KMA crypto subfunctions Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 03/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for KMCTR, KMF, KMO and PCC " Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 04/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for KMAC, KMC, KM, KIMD and KLMD " Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 05/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for PLO subfunctions Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 06/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 08/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 09/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Fix whitespace confusion in ucontrol test Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 10/14] KVM: s390: selftests: correct IP.b length in uc_handle_sieic debug output Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 11/14] KVM: s390: add concurrent-function facility to cpu model Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 12/14] KVM: s390: add msa11 " Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 13/14] KVM: s390: add gen17 facilities to CPU model Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 16:23 ` [GIT PULL 14/14] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for PFCR subfunctions Janosch Frank
2024-11-12 18:19 ` [GIT PULL 00/14] KVM: s390: pull requests for 6.13 Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241112162536.144980-8-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.