From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [RFC net 1/2] netdev-genl: Hold rcu_read_lock in napi_get
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:28:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112172840.0cf9731f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112181401.9689-2-jdamato@fastly.com>
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:13:58 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> +/* must be called under rcu_read_lock(), because napi_by_id requires it */
> +static struct napi_struct *__do_napi_by_id(unsigned int napi_id,
> + struct genl_info *info, int *err)
> +{
> + struct napi_struct *napi;
> +
> + napi = napi_by_id(napi_id);
> + if (napi) {
> + *err = 0;
> + } else {
> + NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack, info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
> + *err = -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + return napi;
> +}
Thanks for the quick follow up! I vote we don't factor this out.
I don't see what it buys us, TBH, normally we factor out code
to avoid having to unlock before return, but this code doesn't
have extra returns...
Just slap an rcu_read_lock / unlock around and that's it?
Feel free to repost soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 18:13 [RFC net 0/2] Fix rcu_read_lock issues in netdev-genl Joe Damato
2024-11-12 18:13 ` [RFC net 1/2] netdev-genl: Hold rcu_read_lock in napi_get Joe Damato
2024-11-13 1:28 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-11-13 1:48 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-13 2:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-13 2:05 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-12 18:13 ` [RFC net 2/2] netdev-genl: Hold rcu_read_lock in napi_set Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112172840.0cf9731f@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.