From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535DA70829 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731517036; cv=none; b=nErUuNGgI8K1ObNNAuzQG64mzuY/0/7V2USo3e5LIAIb7KEextpX4rIFT49pZyyX2/3LMyBmqvxtQhsortNdY07Zw9k+V46Hd9+Y6cidHHf+zgFMqAOAFbWMQ1Xf7WT43WICRvTlBwrqWHNph2iEBtX6ZCcDSQX6Q9paHyUrRf8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731517036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OsSuaSQk8QLwILo/26rZv9pUpH+hBh0nQkoccpbBD4s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=FmG6Da61xYqTLgjKJxvAWpQDiXfUiraLLJZoqULdhikMccRfb49d61YcUvIOPdfUDm7dQLtpGZc4TvY0PEYmPJCo1J9J1ytV5qXA6UQtzvVfMYUP5VWIxJGqH6P2Wu/9ustKogngPcI0ql0fuY9XVGBqrZFX9Jv/zrkG2gg+auM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aKOrqhit; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aKOrqhit" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731517035; x=1763053035; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=OsSuaSQk8QLwILo/26rZv9pUpH+hBh0nQkoccpbBD4s=; b=aKOrqhitu3GHWKIJqp8Q9D6EXiJZJgSYc7YgnHNgioV5X6c2MVas7KTr N/DKaOXz98/ovPZN/MTupsnrY3hjc3cXN9o0ZgEhFziefTbAHGifEKpe/ R3fvlRuX3pbGF77XPP/S7/SdAI5vlg8MzuU2XzNNddYW3887jGslDq9rC v2K2C3pZuqLGUyoJ3KkDybFtsntVfQJaS0SJc+hu0+D7J+Zq2WrHX2oeU okdHfnU/u9VNpPV3IyViAGpqGuxOV43q81NC4+eMFKZ49Pvd8VcfMujnz ItFM64tgeZo0PncP9xccA26apet7+XIRAQqjwcfrjacjembJgEbxIblQF A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: igNsNEbaTjuLhIlbbRsadg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lAssQ1ETSse5ZmOEJAzDdQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11254"; a="31512302" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,151,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="31512302" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2024 08:57:02 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XB3JQhHSTZqCK9maiM4s+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 511yMGQcTGy3WvyPeh3Xsw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,151,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="125442904" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 80bd855f15b3) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2024 08:57:01 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 80bd855f15b3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tBGfq-0000ZN-0t; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:56:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:56:30 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Cc: lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 RB8 Message-ID: <202411140002.Rg1CFCP8-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline :::::: :::::: Manual check reason: "dtcheck: binding changes may go via different trees" :::::: BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> References: <20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> TO: Wasim Nazir TO: Bjorn Andersson TO: Konrad Dybcio TO: Rob Herring TO: Krzysztof Kozlowski TO: Conor Dooley CC: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Wasim Nazir Hi Wasim, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 929beafbe7acce3267c06115e13e03ff6e50548a] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wasim-Nazir/dt-bindings-arm-qcom-ids-add-SoC-ID-for-QCS9075/20241110-225519 base: 929beafbe7acce3267c06115e13e03ff6e50548a patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 RB8 :::::: branch date: 3 days ago :::::: commit date: 3 days ago config: arm64-randconfig-051-20241111 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140002.Rg1CFCP8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 dtschema version: 2024.11 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140002.Rg1CFCP8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411140002.Rg1CFCP8-lkp@intel.com/ dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@800000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@800000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@900000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@900000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@a00000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@a00000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@b00000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@b00000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: crypto@1dfa000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['qcom,sa8775p-qce', 'qcom,qce'] is too long ['qcom,sa8775p-qce', 'qcom,qce'] is too short 'qcom,crypto-v5.1' was expected 'qcom,crypto-v5.4' was expected 'qcom,sa8775p-qce' is not one of ['qcom,ipq4019-qce', 'qcom,sm8150-qce'] 'qcom,sa8775p-qce' is not one of ['qcom,ipq6018-qce', 'qcom,ipq8074-qce', 'qcom,ipq9574-qce', 'qcom,msm8996-qce', 'qcom,qcm2290-qce', 'qcom,sdm845-qce', 'qcom,sm6115-qce'] 'qcom,ipq4019-qce' was expected 'qcom,sm8150-qce' was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/qcom-qce.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: rsc@18200000: 'power-domains' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml# -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki