From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Bird@google.com, Tim <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] PM: sleep: Add helper functions to loop through superior/subordinate devs
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:09:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241114220921.2529905-4-saravanak@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241114220921.2529905-1-saravanak@google.com>
We have a lot of code that does or will loop through superior/subordinate
devices and take action on them. Refactor the code to pull out the common
"loop through" functionality into helper functions to avoid repeating the
logic.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 9b9b6088e56a..aa1470ef6ac0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -247,15 +247,22 @@ static int dpm_wait_fn(struct device *dev, void *async_ptr)
return 0;
}
-static void dpm_wait_for_children(struct device *dev, bool async)
-{
- device_for_each_child(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
-}
-
-static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+static int dpm_for_each_superior(struct device *dev, void *data,
+ int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
{
+ struct device *parent;
+ int ret = 0, idx;
struct device_link *link;
- int idx;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+
+ parent = get_device(dev->parent);
+ if (parent)
+ ret = fn(parent, data);
+ put_device(parent);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
idx = device_links_read_lock();
@@ -267,29 +274,20 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* walking.
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
- dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT) {
+ ret = fn(link->supplier, data);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+
+ return ret;
}
static bool dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
{
- struct device *parent;
-
- /*
- * If the device is resumed asynchronously and the parent's callback
- * deletes both the device and the parent itself, the parent object may
- * be freed while this function is running, so avoid that by reference
- * counting the parent once more unless the device has been deleted
- * already (in which case return right away).
- */
- parent = get_device(dev->parent);
- if (device_pm_initialized(dev))
- dpm_wait(parent, async);
- put_device(parent);
-
- dpm_wait_for_suppliers(dev, async);
+ dpm_for_each_superior(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
/*
* If the parent's callback has deleted the device, attempting to resume
@@ -298,10 +296,18 @@ static bool dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
return device_pm_initialized(dev);
}
-static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+static int dpm_for_each_subordinate(struct device *dev, void *data,
+ int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
{
+ int ret, idx;
struct device_link *link;
- int idx;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = device_for_each_child(dev, data, fn);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
idx = device_links_read_lock();
@@ -315,16 +321,20 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* unregistration).
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
- dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT) {
+ ret = fn(link->consumer, data);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+
+ return ret;
}
static void dpm_wait_for_subordinate(struct device *dev, bool async)
{
- dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
- dpm_wait_for_consumers(dev, async);
+ dpm_for_each_subordinate(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
}
/**
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 22:09 [PATCH v1 0/5] Optimize async device suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] PM: sleep: Fix runtime PM issue in dpm_resume() Saravana Kannan
2024-11-16 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-11-16 21:06 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-04 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-11 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-13 1:49 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-03-13 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-14 20:47 ` Pavel Machek
2025-03-14 20:49 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] PM: sleep: Remove unnecessary mutex lock when waiting on parent Saravana Kannan
2024-12-02 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 20:46 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-02 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 23:27 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-04 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-14 22:09 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] PM: sleep: Do breadth first suspend/resume for async suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2025-03-11 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] PM: sleep: Spread out async kworker threads during dpm_resume*() phases Saravana Kannan
2024-11-15 5:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-15 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-15 15:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-11-15 16:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-11-15 18:33 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-17 0:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 1:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 13:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-18 9:52 ` Christian Loehle
2024-11-18 17:18 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-19 4:04 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Optimize async device suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2024-11-19 9:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241114220921.2529905-4-saravanak@google.com \
--to=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=Bird@google.com \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.