From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BAD14A0B8 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731602185; cv=none; b=A8vUHI7kH2RKLaIYqBkT626FJxipb8oQ+m/JC1GCj89r6vdVK0NvZnQSJcDmGHtMdOZiFV9MIjrpfUupy27OIjg3Kbc081uk5KtNZDlykOU3OgGrGEpBFeWw+yI0AcU3crG5jq8c/QUi0ltxaIwlCGTWxGUgd04d40p710erf5g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731602185; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2ofsYepoaA4QSEbwtEoF6yu6EI2ExTNivNlp2VvRyG4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=TNaJOPfDMvjV5PoDHkznSJxs4HyUmAs6Pvuy4/xG7gGELlGfsBXFfi76rQAMRcRBc2sHAWXRzIlmwPzENP3o2h/HBXKX81El61eg+2NlmDB6/F++fnQsoVV+Z7iCWJzy2fJ4V2LiuMre/sfXcQraeJH1K2cW5qTgZCLpj1bvEmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=V+C5dlHn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="V+C5dlHn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731602183; x=1763138183; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=2ofsYepoaA4QSEbwtEoF6yu6EI2ExTNivNlp2VvRyG4=; b=V+C5dlHn50spPozWfSD4IxKGBpSOMr0Yuh9fuR9o3c619Pg3+rN7ybSN 5mLg7H1HlSIW7rBEY7CljO2xFbAgNKRJVdIXuwaxicFh9Jx/xz/WoRuFE oe0u8I1ds9q2TVF3s+lFRBPjijZyCkcHMhPG3H2X1ndViCHhgeAzEzDiG /pIBicZLXK28mnRSdI5gvc43kTrrQvoacen4mAlpg7dj6jkxMTO2Nun0A SJo+WRpfTFuwSopyk75o9fb86xu9a4ux5wqC/wz8fnxupwI+6WiXd7SfP Zp3DbbBqKJ4FrklqMEGMkJk2RF42JTcQXfvOB1ug3OFv915m9gSqGI9Sx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Jblu7MGuTLWEqz5IubVYnA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ht+mH0jmSd+WF3OYwwvNHQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="31724220" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="31724220" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2024 08:36:14 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uEqdVdkhSJyoR/ZfZJ5c0w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fd1i0KF8SKC7F2kC7fXf4A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,154,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="87827970" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO c7bc087bbc55) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2024 08:36:12 -0800 Received: from kbuild by c7bc087bbc55 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tBcpF-0000AH-2g; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:36:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 00:35:13 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Cc: lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 RB8 Message-ID: <202411150042.5SallPYA-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline :::::: :::::: Manual check reason: "dtcheck: binding changes may go via different trees" :::::: BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> References: <20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> TO: Wasim Nazir TO: Bjorn Andersson TO: Konrad Dybcio TO: Rob Herring TO: Krzysztof Kozlowski TO: Conor Dooley CC: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Wasim Nazir Hi Wasim, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 929beafbe7acce3267c06115e13e03ff6e50548a] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wasim-Nazir/dt-bindings-arm-qcom-ids-add-SoC-ID-for-QCS9075/20241110-225519 base: 929beafbe7acce3267c06115e13e03ff6e50548a patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241110145339.3635437-5-quic_wasimn%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 RB8 :::::: branch date: 4 days ago :::::: commit date: 4 days ago config: arm64-randconfig-051-20241111 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241115/202411150042.5SallPYA-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 dtschema version: 2024.11 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241115/202411150042.5SallPYA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411150042.5SallPYA-lkp@intel.com/ dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@800000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@800000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@900000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@900000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@a00000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@a00000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@b00000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@b00000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: crypto@1dfa000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['qcom,sa8775p-qce', 'qcom,qce'] is too long ['qcom,sa8775p-qce', 'qcom,qce'] is too short 'qcom,crypto-v5.1' was expected 'qcom,crypto-v5.4' was expected 'qcom,sa8775p-qce' is not one of ['qcom,ipq4019-qce', 'qcom,sm8150-qce'] 'qcom,sa8775p-qce' is not one of ['qcom,ipq6018-qce', 'qcom,ipq8074-qce', 'qcom,ipq9574-qce', 'qcom,msm8996-qce', 'qcom,qcm2290-qce', 'qcom,sdm845-qce', 'qcom,sm6115-qce'] 'qcom,ipq4019-qce' was expected 'qcom,sm8150-qce' was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/qcom-qce.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-rb8.dtb: rsc@18200000: 'power-domains' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml# -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki