From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS"
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: check bridge->bus in pci_host_common_remove
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:50:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241115062005.6ifvr6ens2qnrrrf@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028084644.3778081-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> When PCI node was created using an overlay and the overlay is
> reverted/destroyed, the "linux,pci-domain" property no longer exists,
> so of_get_pci_domain_nr will return failure. Then
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr will actually use the dynamic IDA, even
> if the IDA was allocated in static IDA. So the flow is as below:
> A: of_changeset_revert
> pci_host_common_remove
> pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_get_pci_domain_nr # fails because overlay is gone
> ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida)
>
> With driver calls pci_host_common_remove explicity, the flow becomes:
> B pci_host_common_remove
> pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_get_pci_domain_nr # succeeds in this order
> ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_static_ida)
> A of_changeset_revert
> pci_host_common_remove
>
> With updated flow, the pci_host_common_remove will be called twice,
> so need to check 'bridge->bus' to avoid accessing invalid pointer.
>
> Fixes: c14f7ccc9f5d ("PCI: Assign PCI domain IDs by ida_alloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
I went through the previous discussion [1] and I couldn't see an agreement on
the point raised by Bjorn on 'removing the host bridge before the overlay'.
I do think this is a valid point and if you do not think so, please state the
reason.
- Mani
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230913115737.GA426735@bhelgaas/
> ---
>
> V1:
> Not sure to keep the fixes here. I could drop the Fixes tag if it is
> improper.
> This is to revisit the patch [1] which was rejected last year. This
> new flow is using the suggest flow following Bjorn's suggestion.
> But of_changeset_revert will still invoke plaform_remove and then
> pci_host_common_remove. So worked out this patch together with a patch
> to jailhouse driver as below:
> static void destroy_vpci_of_overlay(void)
> {
> + struct device_node *vpci_node = NULL;
> +
> if (overlay_applied) {
> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6,6,0)
> + vpci_node = of_find_node_by_path("/pci@0");
> + if (vpci_node) {
> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(vpci_node);
> + if (!pdev)
> + printk("Not found device for /pci@0\n");
> + else {
> + pci_host_common_remove(pdev);
> + platform_device_put(pdev);
> + }
> + }
> + of_node_put(vpci_node);
> +#endif
> +
> of_changeset_revert(&overlay_changeset);
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230908224858.GA306960@bhelgaas/T/#md12e6097d91a012ede78c997fc5abf460029a569
>
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> index cf5f59a745b3..5a9c29fc57cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> @@ -86,8 +86,10 @@ void pci_host_common_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> - pci_stop_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> - pci_remove_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + if (bridge->bus) {
> + pci_stop_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + pci_remove_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + }
> pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_host_common_remove);
> --
> 2.37.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 8:46 [PATCH] PCI: check bridge->bus in pci_host_common_remove Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-11-15 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-11-15 10:14 ` Peng Fan
2024-11-15 14:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-19 7:30 ` Peng Fan
2024-11-27 19:56 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-02 9:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-02 13:55 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-15 13:26 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-16 5:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-19 17:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241115062005.6ifvr6ens2qnrrrf@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.