From: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [i-g-t V2 1/4] lib/i915_drm_local: Remove macros added via merged kernel
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:32:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118070211.1474372-2-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118070211.1474372-1-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
The uapi on the kernel side is merged, I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE,
DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_OA_ENGINE_CLASS, DRM_I915_QUERY_GEOMETRY_SUBSLICES
and DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE is part of drm-next,
remove this.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
---
lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h b/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
index af0176500..dd646aedf 100644
--- a/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
+++ b/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
@@ -19,12 +19,6 @@ extern "C" {
* or local_ prefix and without any #ifndef's. Attempt should be made to
* clean these up when kernel uapi headers are sync'd.
*/
-#define I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE 4
-
-#define DRM_I915_QUERY_GEOMETRY_SUBSLICES 6
-
-#define DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_OA_ENGINE_CLASS 9
-#define DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE 10
#if defined(__cplusplus)
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 7:02 [i-g-t V2 0/4] Add pci_membarrier test in xe_mmap Tejas Upadhyay
2024-11-18 7:02 ` Tejas Upadhyay [this message]
2024-11-18 7:02 ` [i-g-t V2 2/4] include/drm-uapi-experimental: Move i915_drm_local.h to drm-uapi-experimental Tejas Upadhyay
2024-11-18 10:42 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-18 11:24 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-11-18 7:02 ` [i-g-t V2 3/4] include/intel_drm_local.h: Add DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER Tejas Upadhyay
2024-11-18 7:02 ` [i-g-t V2 4/4] tests/xe/mmap: add tests for pci mem barrier Tejas Upadhyay
2024-11-18 7:05 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Add pci_membarrier test in xe_mmap (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241118070211.1474372-2-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--to=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.