All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:29:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241122092937.6e63d488@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb5d1253-6b52-4c77-9022-7f4e6e50377c@kernel.org>

On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:56:25 -0700 Shuah wrote:
> > To me the dissonance between your admission that people don't CC the
> > current list (IOW status quo isn't great) and the resistance to change
> > is fairly apparent. But it is obviously your call.  
> My thinking is that people don't seem to CC the one mailing list
> we have and adding one more would add to the problem.
> 
> Are there other ways to solve the problem by using prefix like
> we do now for subsystem tests: selftests:framework?

I think the ideal solution would be to let people subscribe to code
paths rather the deal with mailing lists in the first place :(
That way we can fix this on the "mailing list backend" rather than
expecting people who submit code to do the right thing.

Konstantin did some work on auto-CC based on get_maintainer output,
whether vger would just fill in the missing CCs, but AFAIR he got stuck
on the need to modify headers which would break DKIM.

I should mention that lore/lei does support filtering / subscribing 
to paths etc, but from experience bringing folks into upstream
reviews - running lore/lei doesn't work for everyone. I also don't 
use it because it doesn't support the mbox format of my MUA :(

At the current state of affairs, since we can't fix the "receiver" side
easily, we have to shift the responsibility on the "sender" side.
Hope people run get_maintainer, and have well defined lists..

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-22 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-15 20:09 [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all' Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-18 21:02 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-18 21:23   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-22 14:56     ` Shuah
2024-11-22 17:29       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241122092937.6e63d488@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.