From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: kw@linux.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
aman1.gupta@samsung.com, p.rajanbabu@samsung.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:00:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241129163024.dvz2ojldopeoyr6c@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ccd1587a-0368-4bde-9c72-4f10393c58b0@kernel.org>
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:51:30PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 11/29/24 18:24, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > IOCTLs are supposed to return 0 for success and negative error codes for
> > failure. Currently, this driver is returning 0 for failure and 1 for
> > success, that's not correct. Hence, fix it!
> >
> > Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YvzNg5ROnxEApDgS@kroah.com
> > Fixes: 2c156ac71c6b ("misc: Add host side PCI driver for PCI test function device")
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
>
> One nit below.
>
> [...]
>
> > static void pci_endpoint_test_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > diff --git a/tools/pci/pcitest.c b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> > index 470258009ddc..545e04ad63a2 100644
> > --- a/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> > +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/pcitest.h>
> >
> > -static char *result[] = { "NOT OKAY", "OKAY" };
> > static char *irq[] = { "LEGACY", "MSI", "MSI-X" };
> >
> > struct pci_test {
> > @@ -52,63 +51,65 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
> > ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_BAR, test->barnum);
> > fprintf(stdout, "BAR%d:\t\t", test->barnum);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
> > + fprintf(stdout, "NOT OKAY\n");
> > else
> > - fprintf(stdout, "%s\n", result[ret]);
> > + fprintf(stdout, "OKAY\n");
>
> Maybe replace all this "if (ret < 0) ... else ..." and all the ones below with
> something a call to:
>
> static void test_result(int ret)
> {
> fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : "");
> }
>
> or simply with the call:
>
> fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : "");
>
> to avoid all these repetition.
>
Sounds good to me. Will incorporate in next version, thanks!
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-29 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 9:24 [PATCH v2 0/4] Migrate PCI Endpoint Subsystem tests to Kselftest Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: qcom-ep: Mark BAR0/BAR2 as 64bit BARs and BAR1/BAR3 as RESERVED Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 14:38 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-11-29 19:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-30 16:17 ` Greg KH
2024-12-02 12:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-02 17:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-29 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 10:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-11-29 16:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-12-11 7:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests: Move PCI Endpoint tests from tools/pci to Kselftests Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 9:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: pci_endpoint: Migrate to Kselftest framework Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 13:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-11-29 16:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 16:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-11-29 16:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-29 17:13 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-11-29 18:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241129163024.dvz2ojldopeoyr6c@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=aman1.gupta@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=p.rajanbabu@samsung.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.