From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/7] Refactor input01 test
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:15:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241202151521.GC321427@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202-input_refactoring-v2-1-369609492896@suse.com>
Hi Andrea,
I would mention adding a check of the device name in /sys/devices
create_input_device(), because that modifies also a different test
(../uevents/uevent03.c).
> ---
> libs/uinput/tst_uinput.c | 26 ++++-
> testcases/kernel/input/Makefile | 5 +-
> testcases/kernel/input/input01.c | 205 ++++++++--------------------------
> testcases/kernel/input/input_common.h | 97 ++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-)
...
> +static void check_ui_get_sysname_ioctl(int fd)
> +{
> + char sys_name[256];
> + char dev_name[256];
> + char *path;
> +
> + SAFE_IOCTL(fd, UI_GET_SYSNAME(sizeof(sys_name)), sys_name, NULL);
> + SAFE_ASPRINTF(&path, "/sys/devices/virtual/input/%s/name", sys_name);
> +
> + if (FILE_SCANF(path, "%s", dev_name)) {
> + tst_brk(TBROK|TERRNO, "Failed to read '%s'", path);
> + free(path);
I guess free(path) here is not needed due exit() via tst_brk() right?
And if it's needed, you meant to first free and then tst_brk().
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (strcmp(VIRTUAL_DEVICE, dev_name))
And if I'm wrong, then free(path) should be also here.
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "ioctl UI_GET_SYSNAME returned wrong name");
The rest LGTM, nice cleanup (free can be fixed before merge).
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 10:12 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/7] Rewrite input testing suite Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/7] Refactor input01 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 15:15 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/7] Refactor input02 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/7] Refactor input03 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/7] Refactor input04 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 5/7] Refactor input05 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 6/7] Refactor input06 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-03 11:34 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-03 11:43 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2024-12-02 10:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 7/7] Delete depreacted input test suite helper Andrea Cervesato
2024-12-03 11:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/7] Rewrite input testing suite Andrea Cervesato via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241202151521.GC321427@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.