From: Ferry Meng <mengferry@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ferry Meng <mengferry@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support for virtio-blk
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 20:14:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203121424.19887-1-mengferry@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
We seek to develop a more flexible way to use virtio-blk and bypass the block
layer logic in order to accomplish certain performance optimizations. As a
result, we referred to the implementation of io_uring passthrough in NVMe
and implemented it in the virtio-blk driver. This patch series adds io_uring
passthrough support for virtio-blk devices, resulting in lower submit latency
and increased flexibility when utilizing virtio-blk.
To test this patch series, I changed fio's code:
1. Added virtio-blk support to engines/io_uring.c.
2. Added virtio-blk support to the t/io_uring.c testing tool.
Link: https://github.com/jdmfr/fio
Using t/io_uring-vblk, the performance of virtio-blk based on uring-cmd
scales better than block device access. (such as below, Virtio-Blk with QEMU,
1-depth fio)
(passthru) read: IOPS=17.2k, BW=67.4MiB/s (70.6MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=2907, max=43592, avg=3981.87, stdev=595.10
clat (usec): min=38, max=285,avg=53.47, stdev= 8.28
lat (usec): min=44, max=288, avg=57.45, stdev= 8.28
(block) read: IOPS=15.3k, BW=59.8MiB/s (62.7MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=3408, max=35366, avg=5102.17, stdev=790.79
clat (usec): min=35, max=343, avg=59.63, stdev=10.26
lat (usec): min=43, max=349, avg=64.73, stdev=10.21
Testing the virtio-blk device with fio using 'engines=io_uring_cmd'
and 'engines=io_uring' also demonstrates improvements in submit latency.
(passthru) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/vdcc0
IOPS=189.80K, BW=741MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=187.68K, BW=733MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
(block) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u0 /dev/vdc
IOPS=101.51K, BW=396MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=100.01K, BW=390MiB/s, IOS/call=4/4
The performance overhead of submitting IO can be decreased by 25% overall
with this patch series. The implementation primarily references 'nvme io_uring
passthrough', supporting io_uring_cmd through a separate character interface
(temporarily named /dev/vdXc0). Since this is an early version, many
details need to be taken into account and redesigned, like:
● Currently, it only considers READ/WRITE scenarios, some more complex operations
not included like discard or zone ops.(Normal sqe64 is sufficient, in my opinion;
following upgrades, sqe128 and cqe32 might not be needed).
● ......
I would appreciate any useful recommendations.
Ferry Meng (3):
virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support.
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 16 ++
2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 12:14 Ferry Meng [this message]
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support Ferry Meng
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev Ferry Meng
2024-12-04 15:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support Ferry Meng
2024-12-04 21:47 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support for virtio-blk Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-12-05 9:51 ` [Resend]Re: " Ferry Meng
2024-12-16 2:01 ` Ferry Meng
2024-12-16 7:38 ` Jason Wang
2024-12-16 12:07 ` Ferry Meng
2024-12-17 2:08 ` Jason Wang
2024-12-17 6:04 ` Ferry Meng
2024-12-16 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-16 16:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-12-17 2:12 ` Jason Wang
2024-12-17 6:08 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-12-17 17:54 ` Jens Axboe
2024-12-17 21:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-12-17 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2024-12-18 3:35 ` Ferry Meng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241203121424.19887-1-mengferry@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=mengferry@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.