From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
syzbot+1939f24bdb783e9e43d9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid potential UAF in default_operstate()
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204125717.6wxa4llwpdhv5hon@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+hjGLeGd-wFi+CS=HkrvcHtTso74qJVFLk44cVqid92g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:41 PM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > I meant: linkwatch runs periodically, via linkwatch_event(). Isn't there
> > a chance that linkwatch_event() can run once, immediately after
> > __rtnl_unlock() in netdev_run_todo(), while the netdev is in the
> > NETREG_UNREGISTERING state? Won't that create problems for __dev_get_by_index()
> > too? I guess it depends on when the netns is torn down, which I couldn't find.
>
> I think lweventlist_lock and dev->link_watch_list are supposed to
> synchronize things.
>
> linkwatch_sync_dev() only calls linkwatch_do_dev() if the device was
> atomically unlinked from lweventlist
No, I don't mean calls from linkwatch_sync_dev(). I mean other call
paths towards linkwatch_do_dev(), like for example linkwatch_fire_event() -
carrier down, whatever. Can't these be pending on an unregistering
net_device at the time we run __rtnl_unlock() in netdev_run_todo?
Otherwise, why would netdev_wait_allrefs_any() have a linkwatch_run_queue()
call just later?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 17:09 [PATCH net] net: avoid potential UAF in default_operstate() Eric Dumazet
2024-12-03 17:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-03 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 11:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-04 11:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 12:57 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2024-12-04 13:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 14:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-04 14:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-05 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204125717.6wxa4llwpdhv5hon@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+1939f24bdb783e9e43d9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.