[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 11/36] ring-buffer: Limit time with disabled interrupts in rb_check_pages()

[Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>]

From: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit b237e1f7d2273fdcffac20100b72c002bdd770dd ]

The function rb_check_pages() validates the integrity of a specified
per-CPU tracing ring buffer. It does so by traversing the underlying
linked list and checking its next and prev links.

To guarantee that the list isn't modified during the check, a caller
typically needs to take cpu_buffer->reader_lock. This prevents the check
from running concurrently, for example, with a potential reader which
can make the list temporarily inconsistent when swapping its old reader
page into the buffer.

A problem with this approach is that the time when interrupts are
disabled is non-deterministic, dependent on the ring buffer size. This
particularly affects PREEMPT_RT because the reader_lock is a raw
spinlock which doesn't become sleepable on PREEMPT_RT kernels.

Modify the check so it still attempts to traverse the entire list, but
gives up the reader_lock between checking individual pages. Introduce
for this purpose a new variable ring_buffer_per_cpu.cnt which is bumped
any time the list is modified. The value is used by rb_check_pages() to
detect such a change and restart the check.

Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241015112810.27203-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 5807116bcd0bf..366eb4c4f28e5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
 	unsigned long			nr_pages;
 	unsigned int			current_context;
 	struct list_head		*pages;
+	/* pages generation counter, incremented when the list changes */
+	unsigned long			cnt;
 	struct buffer_page		*head_page;	/* read from head */
 	struct buffer_page		*tail_page;	/* write to tail */
 	struct buffer_page		*commit_page;	/* committed pages */
@@ -1475,40 +1477,87 @@ static void rb_check_bpage(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 	RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, val & RB_FLAG_MASK);
 }
 
+static bool rb_check_links(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
+			   struct list_head *list)
+{
+	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
+		       rb_list_head(rb_list_head(list->next)->prev) != list))
+		return false;
+
+	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
+		       rb_list_head(rb_list_head(list->prev)->next) != list))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * rb_check_pages - integrity check of buffer pages
  * @cpu_buffer: CPU buffer with pages to test
  *
  * As a safety measure we check to make sure the data pages have not
  * been corrupted.
- *
- * Callers of this function need to guarantee that the list of pages doesn't get
- * modified during the check. In particular, if it's possible that the function
- * is invoked with concurrent readers which can swap in a new reader page then
- * the caller should take cpu_buffer->reader_lock.
  */
 static void rb_check_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 {
-	struct list_head *head = rb_list_head(cpu_buffer->pages);
-	struct list_head *tmp;
+	struct list_head *head, *tmp;
+	unsigned long buffer_cnt;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int nr_loops = 0;
 
-	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-			rb_list_head(rb_list_head(head->next)->prev) != head))
+	/*
+	 * Walk the linked list underpinning the ring buffer and validate all
+	 * its next and prev links.
+	 *
+	 * The check acquires the reader_lock to avoid concurrent processing
+	 * with code that could be modifying the list. However, the lock cannot
+	 * be held for the entire duration of the walk, as this would make the
+	 * time when interrupts are disabled non-deterministic, dependent on the
+	 * ring buffer size. Therefore, the code releases and re-acquires the
+	 * lock after checking each page. The ring_buffer_per_cpu.cnt variable
+	 * is then used to detect if the list was modified while the lock was
+	 * not held, in which case the check needs to be restarted.
+	 *
+	 * The code attempts to perform the check at most three times before
+	 * giving up. This is acceptable because this is only a self-validation
+	 * to detect problems early on. In practice, the list modification
+	 * operations are fairly spaced, and so this check typically succeeds at
+	 * most on the second try.
+	 */
+again:
+	if (++nr_loops > 3)
 		return;
 
-	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-			rb_list_head(rb_list_head(head->prev)->next) != head))
-		return;
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	head = rb_list_head(cpu_buffer->pages);
+	if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, head))
+		goto out_locked;
+	buffer_cnt = cpu_buffer->cnt;
+	tmp = head;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
-	for (tmp = rb_list_head(head->next); tmp != head; tmp = rb_list_head(tmp->next)) {
-		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-				rb_list_head(rb_list_head(tmp->next)->prev) != tmp))
-			return;
+	while (true) {
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
-		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-				rb_list_head(rb_list_head(tmp->prev)->next) != tmp))
-			return;
+		if (buffer_cnt != cpu_buffer->cnt) {
+			/* The list was updated, try again. */
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		tmp = rb_list_head(tmp->next);
+		if (tmp == head)
+			/* The iteration circled back, all is done. */
+			goto out_locked;
+
+		if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, tmp))
+			goto out_locked;
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	}
+
+out_locked:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2532,6 +2581,7 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned long nr_pages)
 
 	/* make sure pages points to a valid page in the ring buffer */
 	cpu_buffer->pages = next_page;
+	cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 
 	/* update head page */
 	if (head_bit)
@@ -2638,6 +2688,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 			 * pointer to point to end of list
 			 */
 			head_page->prev = last_page;
+			cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 			success = true;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -2873,12 +2924,8 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
 		 */
 		synchronize_rcu();
 		for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
-			unsigned long flags;
-
 			cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
-			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 			rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
-			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 		}
 		atomic_dec(&buffer->record_disabled);
 	}
@@ -5296,6 +5343,7 @@ rb_get_reader_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 	rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
 	rb_inc_page(&cpu_buffer->head_page);
 
+	cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 	local_inc(&cpu_buffer->pages_read);
 
 	/* Finally update the reader page to the new head */
@@ -5835,12 +5883,9 @@ void
 ring_buffer_read_finish(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Use this opportunity to check the integrity of the ring buffer. */
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
 	atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
 	kfree(iter->event);
@@ -6757,6 +6802,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
 		/* Install the new pages, remove the head from the list */
 		cpu_buffer->pages = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
 		list_del_init(&cpu_buffer->new_pages);
+		cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 
 		cpu_buffer->head_page
 			= list_entry(cpu_buffer->pages, struct buffer_page, list);
-- 
2.43.0