All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:22:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202412041926.d2p2hcQe-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203212854.5565-1-paul@os.amperecomputing.com>

Hi Paul,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.13-rc1 next-20241203]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paul-Benoit/firmware-smccc-Support-optional-Arm-SMC-SOC_ID-name/20241204-124243
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203212854.5565-1-paul%40os.amperecomputing.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
config: arm-sp7021_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041926.d2p2hcQe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041926.d2p2hcQe-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041926.d2p2hcQe-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c: In function 'str_fragment_from_reg':
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c:109:23: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
     109 |         dst[4] = (reg >> 32) & 0xff;
         |                       ^~
   drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c:110:23: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
     110 |         dst[5] = (reg >> 40) & 0xff;
         |                       ^~
   drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c:111:23: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
     111 |         dst[6] = (reg >> 48) & 0xff;
         |                       ^~
   drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c:112:23: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
     112 |         dst[7] = (reg >> 56) & 0xff;
         |                       ^~
   drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c: At top level:
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c:37:29: warning: 'smccc_soc_id_name' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
      37 | static char __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_name[136] = "";
         |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +109 drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c

    36	
  > 37	static char __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_name[136] = "";
    38	
    39	static int __init smccc_soc_init(void)
    40	{
    41		int soc_id_rev, soc_id_version;
    42		static char soc_id_str[20], soc_id_rev_str[12];
    43		static char soc_id_jep106_id_str[12];
    44	
    45		if (arm_smccc_get_version() < ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_2)
    46			return 0;
    47	
    48		soc_id_version = arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version();
    49		if (soc_id_version == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
    50			pr_info("ARCH_SOC_ID not implemented, skipping ....\n");
    51			return 0;
    52		}
    53	
    54		if (soc_id_version < 0) {
    55			pr_err("Invalid SoC Version: %x\n", soc_id_version);
    56			return -EINVAL;
    57		}
    58	
    59		soc_id_rev = arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision();
    60		if (soc_id_rev < 0) {
    61			pr_err("Invalid SoC Revision: %x\n", soc_id_rev);
    62			return -EINVAL;
    63		}
    64	
    65		soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
    66		if (!soc_dev_attr)
    67			return -ENOMEM;
    68	
    69		sprintf(soc_id_rev_str, "0x%08x", soc_id_rev);
    70		sprintf(soc_id_jep106_id_str, "jep106:%02x%02x",
    71			JEP106_BANK_CONT_CODE(soc_id_version),
    72			JEP106_ID_CODE(soc_id_version));
    73		sprintf(soc_id_str, "%s:%04x", soc_id_jep106_id_str,
    74			IMP_DEF_SOC_ID(soc_id_version));
    75	
    76		soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc_id_str;
    77		soc_dev_attr->revision = soc_id_rev_str;
    78		soc_dev_attr->family = soc_id_jep106_id_str;
    79		soc_dev_attr->machine = smccc_soc_name_init();
    80	
    81		soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
    82		if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
    83			kfree(soc_dev_attr);
    84			return PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
    85		}
    86	
    87		pr_info("ID = %s Revision = %s\n", soc_dev_attr->soc_id,
    88			soc_dev_attr->revision);
    89	
    90		return 0;
    91	}
    92	module_init(smccc_soc_init);
    93	
    94	static void __exit smccc_soc_exit(void)
    95	{
    96		if (soc_dev)
    97			soc_device_unregister(soc_dev);
    98		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
    99	}
   100	module_exit(smccc_soc_exit);
   101	
   102	
   103	static inline void str_fragment_from_reg(char *dst, unsigned long reg)
   104	{
   105		dst[0] = (reg >> 0)  & 0xff;
   106		dst[1] = (reg >> 8)  & 0xff;
   107		dst[2] = (reg >> 16) & 0xff;
   108		dst[3] = (reg >> 24) & 0xff;
 > 109		dst[4] = (reg >> 32) & 0xff;
   110		dst[5] = (reg >> 40) & 0xff;
   111		dst[6] = (reg >> 48) & 0xff;
   112		dst[7] = (reg >> 56) & 0xff;
   113	}
   114	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-04 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-14  3:04 [PATCH] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name Paul Benoit
2024-11-14 12:22 ` Mark Rutland
2024-11-25 22:52   ` Paul Benoit
2024-11-17  0:12 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17  0:56 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-03 21:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Benoit
2024-12-04 11:22   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-12-04 12:26   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-18  0:13 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Benoit
2025-02-10 12:13   ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-14 22:59     ` Paul Benoit
2025-02-19  0:59 ` [PATCH v4] " Paul Benoit
2025-03-03 14:18   ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-03 14:45     ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 17:07       ` Paul Benoit
2025-03-04 10:58   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202412041926.d2p2hcQe-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.