From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chao@kernel.org,jaegeuk@kernel.org,piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 13:06:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:17:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm
device
Piergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 969 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:1330
RIP: 0010:__submit_discard_cmd+0x27d/0x400 [f2fs]
Call Trace:
__issue_discard_cmd+0x1ca/0x350 [f2fs]
issue_discard_thread+0x191/0x480 [f2fs]
kthread+0xcf/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
w/ below testcase, it can reproduce this bug quickly:
- pvcreate /dev/vdb
- vgcreate myvg1 /dev/vdb
- lvcreate -L 1024m -n mylv1 myvg1
- mount /dev/myvg1/mylv1 /mnt/f2fs
- dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/f2fs/file bs=1M count=20
- sync
- rm /mnt/f2fs/file
- sync
- lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n mylv1-snapshot /dev/myvg1/mylv1
- umount /mnt/f2fs
The root cause is: it will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm
device to zero after creating snapshot on this lvm device, then,
__submit_discard_cmd() will pass parameter @nr_sects w/ zero value
to __blkdev_issue_discard(), it returns a NULL bio pointer, result
in panic.
This patch changes as below for fixing:
1. Let's drop all remained discards in f2fs_unfreeze() if snapshot
of lvm device is created.
2. Checking discard_max_bytes before submitting discard during
__submit_discard_cmd().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 35ec7d574884 ("f2fs: split discard command in prior to block layer")
Reported-by: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219484
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 4236040e3994..eade36c5ef13 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1290,16 +1290,18 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
wait_list, issued);
return 0;
}
-
- /*
- * Issue discard for conventional zones only if the device
- * supports discard.
- */
- if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
#endif
+ /*
+ * stop issuing discard for any of below cases:
+ * 1. device is conventional zone, but it doesn't support discard.
+ * 2. device is regulare device, after snapshot it doesn't support
+ * discard.
+ */
+ if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
trace_f2fs_issue_discard(bdev, dc->di.start, dc->di.len);
lstart = dc->di.lstart;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index c0670cd61956..fc7d463dee15 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,18 @@ static int f2fs_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
static int f2fs_unfreeze(struct super_block *sb)
{
+ struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
+
+ /*
+ * It will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm device to zero
+ * after creating snapshot on this lvm device, let's drop all
+ * remained discards.
+ * We don't need to disable real-time discard because discard_max_bytes
+ * will recover after removal of snapshot.
+ */
+ if (test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) && !f2fs_hw_support_discard(sbi))
+ f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(sbi);
+
clear_sbi_flag(F2FS_SB(sb), SBI_IS_FREEZING);
return 0;
}
reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.