From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
kjain101@in.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, gjoyce@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix potential deadlock in queue_attr_store()
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 22:17:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206164742.526149-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
For storing a value to a queue attribute, the queue_attr_store function
first freezes the queue (->q_usage_counter(io)) and then acquire
->sysfs_lock. This seems not correct as the usual ordering should be to
acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. This incorrect ordering
causes the following lockdep splat which we are able to reproduce always
simply by accessing /sys/kernel/debug file using ls command:
[ 57.597146] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 57.597154] 6.12.0-10553-gb86545e02e8c #20 Tainted: G W
[ 57.597162] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 57.597168] ls/4605 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 57.597176] c00000003eb56710 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: __might_fault+0x58/0xc0
[ 57.597200]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 57.597207] c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4
[ 57.597226]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 57.597233]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 57.597241]
-> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}:
[ 57.597255] down_write+0x6c/0x18c
[ 57.597264] start_creating+0xb4/0x24c
[ 57.597274] debugfs_create_dir+0x2c/0x1e8
[ 57.597283] blk_register_queue+0xec/0x294
[ 57.597292] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548
[ 57.597302] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338
[ 57.597309] brd_init+0x100/0x178
[ 57.597317] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4
[ 57.597326] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0
[ 57.597334] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc
[ 57.597342] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
[ 57.597350]
-> #4 (&q->debugfs_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
[ 57.597362] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0
[ 57.597370] blk_register_queue+0xd4/0x294
[ 57.597379] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548
[ 57.597388] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338
[ 57.597395] brd_init+0x100/0x178
[ 57.597402] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4
[ 57.597410] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0
[ 57.597418] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc
[ 57.597426] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
[ 57.597434]
-> #3 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
[ 57.597446] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0
[ 57.597454] queue_attr_store+0x9c/0x110
[ 57.597462] sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xb0
[ 57.597471] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b0/0x2ac
[ 57.597480] vfs_write+0x3dc/0x6e8
[ 57.597488] ksys_write+0x84/0x140
[ 57.597495] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[ 57.597504] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[ 57.597516]
-> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#21){++++}-{0:0}:
[ 57.597530] __submit_bio+0x5ec/0x828
[ 57.597538] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x1e4/0x4f0
[ 57.597547] iomap_readahead+0x2a0/0x448
[ 57.597556] xfs_vm_readahead+0x28/0x3c
[ 57.597564] read_pages+0x88/0x41c
[ 57.597571] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ac/0x2d8
[ 57.597580] filemap_get_pages+0x188/0x984
[ 57.597588] filemap_read+0x13c/0x4bc
[ 57.597596] xfs_file_buffered_read+0x88/0x17c
[ 57.597605] xfs_file_read_iter+0xac/0x158
[ 57.597614] vfs_read+0x2d4/0x3b4
[ 57.597622] ksys_read+0x84/0x144
[ 57.597629] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[ 57.597637] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[ 57.597647]
-> #1 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}:
[ 57.597661] down_read+0x6c/0x220
[ 57.597669] filemap_fault+0x870/0x100c
[ 57.597677] xfs_filemap_fault+0xc4/0x18c
[ 57.597684] __do_fault+0x64/0x164
[ 57.597693] __handle_mm_fault+0x1274/0x1dac
[ 57.597702] handle_mm_fault+0x248/0x484
[ 57.597711] ___do_page_fault+0x428/0xc0c
[ 57.597719] hash__do_page_fault+0x30/0x68
[ 57.597727] do_hash_fault+0x90/0x35c
[ 57.597736] data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220
[ 57.597745] _copy_from_user+0xf8/0x19c
[ 57.597754] sel_write_load+0x178/0xd54
[ 57.597762] vfs_write+0x108/0x6e8
[ 57.597769] ksys_write+0x84/0x140
[ 57.597777] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[ 57.597785] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[ 57.597794]
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
[ 57.597806] __lock_acquire+0x17cc/0x2330
[ 57.597814] lock_acquire+0x138/0x400
[ 57.597822] __might_fault+0x7c/0xc0
[ 57.597830] filldir64+0xe8/0x390
[ 57.597839] dcache_readdir+0x80/0x2d4
[ 57.597846] iterate_dir+0xd8/0x1d4
[ 57.597855] sys_getdents64+0x88/0x2d4
[ 57.597864] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[ 57.597872] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[ 57.597881]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 57.597888] Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> &q->debugfs_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3
[ 57.597905] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 57.597911] CPU0 CPU1
[ 57.597917] ---- ----
[ 57.597922] rlock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
[ 57.597932] lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
[ 57.597940] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
[ 57.597950] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
[ 57.597958]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 57.597965] 2 locks held by ls/4605:
[ 57.597971] #0: c0000000137c12f8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0xcc/0x154
[ 57.597989] #1: c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4
Prevent the above lockdep warning by acquiring ->sysfs_lock before
freezing the queue while storing a queue attribute in queue_attr_store
function.
Reported-by: kjain101@in.ibm.com
Fixes: af2814149883 ("block: freeze the queue in queue_attr_store")
Tested-by: kjain101@in.ibm.com
Cc: hch@lst.de
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: ritesh.list@gmail.com
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: gjoyce@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
---
block/blk-sysfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index 4241aea84161..f648b112782f 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -706,11 +706,11 @@ queue_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
if (entry->load_module)
entry->load_module(disk, page, length);
- blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
+ blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
res = entry->store(disk, page, length);
- mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+ mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
return res;
}
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 16:47 Nilay Shroff [this message]
2024-12-07 3:17 ` [PATCH] block: Fix potential deadlock in queue_attr_store() Ming Lei
2024-12-08 10:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-12-09 9:16 ` Ming Lei
2024-12-09 17:40 ` Nilay Shroff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-06 16:47 Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241206164742.526149-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kjain101@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.