From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>,
Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Ye Weihua <yeweihua4@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:16:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206181620.91603-3-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206181620.91603-1-sj@kernel.org>
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Patch series "mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in
damon_va_evenly_split_region()". v2.
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision, then
each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to 'end'
would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
And add 'nr_piece == 1' check in damon_va_evenly_split_region() for better
code readability and add a corresponding kunit testcase.
This patch (of 2):
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision,
then each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to
'end' would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
After this patch, damon-operations test passed:
# ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run damon-operations
[...]
============== damon-operations (6 subtests) ===============
[PASSED] damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions1
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions2
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions3
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions4
[PASSED] damon_test_split_evenly
================ [PASSED] damon-operations =================
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-1-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-2-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 3f49584b262c ("mm/damon: implement primitives for the virtual memory address spaces")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
Cc: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Ye Weihua <yeweihua4@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit f3c7a1ede435e2e45177d7a490a85fb0a0ec96d1)
---
mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 1 +
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
index 95ec362cdc37..5531766ff09f 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 3, 2);
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
damon_destroy_ctx(c);
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index 6ad96da15081..6d8036671e60 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(struct damon_target *t,
unsigned long sz_orig, sz_piece, orig_end;
struct damon_region *n = NULL, *next;
unsigned long start;
+ unsigned int i;
if (!r || !nr_pieces)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -82,8 +83,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(struct damon_target *t,
r->ar.end = r->ar.start + sz_piece;
next = damon_next_region(r);
- for (start = r->ar.end; start + sz_piece <= orig_end;
- start += sz_piece) {
+ for (start = r->ar.end, i = 1; i < nr_pieces; start += sz_piece, i++) {
n = damon_new_region(start, start + sz_piece);
if (!n)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 10:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2024-12-06 18:16 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 0/2] fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() SeongJae Park
2024-12-06 18:16 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] mm/damon/vaddr-test: split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size SeongJae Park
2024-12-06 20:30 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 2:07 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-06 18:16 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2024-12-07 2:07 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241206181620.91603-3-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=foersleo@amazon.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yeweihua4@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.