From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
chao.gao@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: VMX: Move posted interrupt delivery code to common header
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:07:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241209010734.3543481-5-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209010734.3543481-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Move posted interrupt delivery code to common header so that TDX can
leverage it.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
[binbin: split into new patch]
Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
---
TDX interrupts breakout:
- This is split out from patch "KVM: TDX: Implement interrupt injection"
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 59 +-------------------------------
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
index 7a592467a044..a46f15ddeda1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include "posted_intr.h"
#include "mmu.h"
static inline bool vt_is_tdx_private_gpa(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa)
@@ -40,4 +41,74 @@ static inline int __vmx_handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, error_code, NULL, 0);
}
+static inline void kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ int pi_vec)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
+ /*
+ * The vector of the virtual has already been set in the PIR.
+ * Send a notification event to deliver the virtual interrupt
+ * unless the vCPU is the currently running vCPU, i.e. the
+ * event is being sent from a fastpath VM-Exit handler, in
+ * which case the PIR will be synced to the vIRR before
+ * re-entering the guest.
+ *
+ * When the target is not the running vCPU, the following
+ * possibilities emerge:
+ *
+ * Case 1: vCPU stays in non-root mode. Sending a notification
+ * event posts the interrupt to the vCPU.
+ *
+ * Case 2: vCPU exits to root mode and is still runnable. The
+ * PIR will be synced to the vIRR before re-entering the guest.
+ * Sending a notification event is ok as the host IRQ handler
+ * will ignore the spurious event.
+ *
+ * Case 3: vCPU exits to root mode and is blocked. vcpu_block()
+ * has already synced PIR to vIRR and never blocks the vCPU if
+ * the vIRR is not empty. Therefore, a blocked vCPU here does
+ * not wait for any requested interrupts in PIR, and sending a
+ * notification event also results in a benign, spurious event.
+ */
+
+ if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu())
+ __apic_send_IPI_mask(get_cpu_mask(vcpu->cpu), pi_vec);
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+ /*
+ * The vCPU isn't in the guest; wake the vCPU in case it is blocking,
+ * otherwise do nothing as KVM will grab the highest priority pending
+ * IRQ via ->sync_pir_to_irr() in vcpu_enter_guest().
+ */
+ kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Send interrupt to vcpu via posted interrupt way.
+ * 1. If target vcpu is running(non-root mode), send posted interrupt
+ * notification to vcpu and hardware will sync PIR to vIRR atomically.
+ * 2. If target vcpu isn't running(root mode), kick it to pick up the
+ * interrupt from PIR in next vmentry.
+ */
+static inline void __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct pi_desc *pi_desc, int vector)
+{
+ if (pi_test_and_set_pir(vector, pi_desc))
+ return;
+
+ /* If a previous notification has sent the IPI, nothing to do. */
+ if (pi_test_and_set_on(pi_desc))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * The implied barrier in pi_test_and_set_on() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
+ * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU is
+ * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a
+ * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
+ */
+ kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
+}
+
#endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index f7ae2359cea2..176fd5da3a3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4167,50 +4167,6 @@ void vmx_msr_filter_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pt_update_intercept_for_msr(vcpu);
}
-static inline void kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- int pi_vec)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
- /*
- * The vector of the virtual has already been set in the PIR.
- * Send a notification event to deliver the virtual interrupt
- * unless the vCPU is the currently running vCPU, i.e. the
- * event is being sent from a fastpath VM-Exit handler, in
- * which case the PIR will be synced to the vIRR before
- * re-entering the guest.
- *
- * When the target is not the running vCPU, the following
- * possibilities emerge:
- *
- * Case 1: vCPU stays in non-root mode. Sending a notification
- * event posts the interrupt to the vCPU.
- *
- * Case 2: vCPU exits to root mode and is still runnable. The
- * PIR will be synced to the vIRR before re-entering the guest.
- * Sending a notification event is ok as the host IRQ handler
- * will ignore the spurious event.
- *
- * Case 3: vCPU exits to root mode and is blocked. vcpu_block()
- * has already synced PIR to vIRR and never blocks the vCPU if
- * the vIRR is not empty. Therefore, a blocked vCPU here does
- * not wait for any requested interrupts in PIR, and sending a
- * notification event also results in a benign, spurious event.
- */
-
- if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu())
- __apic_send_IPI_mask(get_cpu_mask(vcpu->cpu), pi_vec);
- return;
- }
-#endif
- /*
- * The vCPU isn't in the guest; wake the vCPU in case it is blocking,
- * otherwise do nothing as KVM will grab the highest priority pending
- * IRQ via ->sync_pir_to_irr() in vcpu_enter_guest().
- */
- kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
-}
-
static int vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int vector)
{
@@ -4270,20 +4226,7 @@ static int vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
if (!vcpu->arch.apic->apicv_active)
return -1;
- if (pi_test_and_set_pir(vector, &vmx->pi_desc))
- return 0;
-
- /* If a previous notification has sent the IPI, nothing to do. */
- if (pi_test_and_set_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * The implied barrier in pi_test_and_set_on() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
- * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU is
- * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a
- * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
- */
- kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
+ __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(vcpu, &vmx->pi_desc, vector);
return 0;
}
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 1:07 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: TDX: TDX interrupts Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: TDX: Add support for find pending IRQ in a protected local APIC Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 15:38 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-01-10 5:36 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: VMX: Remove use of struct vcpu_vmx from posted_intr.c Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: TDX: Disable PI wakeup for IPIv Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: TDX: Implement non-NMI interrupt injection Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is protected Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: TDX: Wait lapic expire when timer IRQ was injected Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: TDX: Implement methods to inject NMI Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: TDX: Complete interrupts after TD exit Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: TDX: Handle SMI request as !CONFIG_KVM_SMM Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 11/16] KVM: TDX: Always block INIT/SIPI Binbin Wu
2025-01-08 7:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-08 7:53 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-08 14:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-09 2:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-09 2:26 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 2:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-09 3:20 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 4:01 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-09 2:51 ` Huang, Kai
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 12/16] KVM: TDX: Inhibit APICv for TDX guest Binbin Wu
2025-01-03 21:59 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 1:46 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-06 22:49 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 23:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-07 3:24 ` Chao Gao
2025-01-07 8:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-07 21:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 2:03 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-13 2:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-13 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-14 8:20 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-14 16:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-16 11:55 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-16 14:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-16 20:16 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-16 22:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-17 9:53 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-17 10:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-17 15:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-17 0:49 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 13/16] KVM: TDX: Add methods to ignore virtual apic related operation Binbin Wu
2025-01-03 22:04 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-22 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-22 13:59 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 14/16] KVM: VMX: Move NMI/exception handler to common helper Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 15/16] KVM: TDX: Handle EXCEPTION_NMI and EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 16/16] KVM: TDX: Handle EXIT_REASON_OTHER_SMI Binbin Wu
2024-12-10 18:24 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: TDX: TDX interrupts Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-06 10:51 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-06 20:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-09 2:44 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241209010734.3543481-5-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.