All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org,
	yury.norov@gmail.com, kees@kernel.org, gustavoars@kernel.org,
	nathan@kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com,
	daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, gjoyce@ibm.com,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux@weissschuh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] gcc: disable '-Wstrignop-overread' universally for gcc-13+ and FORTIFY_SOURCE
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 07:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120938-kilogram-granite-9a53@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241208161315.730138-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>

On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 09:42:28PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As this is different, my Ack does not still stand, sorry :(

> +# Currently, disable -Wstringop-overread for gcc-13+ and FORTIFY_SOURCE globally.
> +config GCC13_NO_STRINGOP_OVERREAD
> +	def_bool y

I hit this with gcc 14, it's not just a gcc 13 issue.

> +config CC_NO_STRINGOP_OVERREAD
> +	bool
> +	default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 130000 && GCC13_NO_STRINGOP_OVERREAD && FORTIFY_SOURCE

Ok, I see you enabled this for more than 13, but why call it "13"?

> +
>  #
>  # For architectures that know their GCC __int128 support is sound
>  #
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> index 1d13cecc7cc7..1abd41269fd0 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ endif
>  KBUILD_CPPFLAGS-$(CONFIG_WERROR) += -Werror
>  KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS-y)
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS) += -Wno-array-bounds
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_CC_NO_STRINGOP_OVERREAD) += -Wno-stringop-overread

I don't want this disabled for all files in the kernel, we only have one
that this is a problem for.  I think you disable this, the whole fortify
logic is disabled which is not the goal, why not just force the fortify
feature OFF if we have a "bad compiler" that can not support it?

So no, I don't think this is the correct solution here, sorry.

And it's odd that we are the only 2 people hitting it, has everyone else
just given up on gcc and moved on to using clang?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-09  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-08 16:12 [PATCHv3] gcc: disable '-Wstrignop-overread' universally for gcc-13+ and FORTIFY_SOURCE Nilay Shroff
2024-12-08 18:25 ` Yury Norov
2024-12-09 19:35   ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-12-10  8:28     ` Nilay Shroff
2024-12-10 16:14       ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-12-11  9:16         ` Nilay Shroff
2024-12-09  6:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-12-09 17:09   ` Nilay Shroff
2024-12-09 20:03   ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-12-09 20:43     ` Yury Norov
2024-12-09 22:24       ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-12-12 18:24 ` Kees Cook
2024-12-12 18:47   ` Kees Cook
2024-12-12 19:34     ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024120938-kilogram-granite-9a53@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.