From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, sanglipeng <sanglipeng1@jd.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:OLK-5.10 2570/2570] drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:07:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202412100719.EfO2Bdyg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hi Fabio,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10
head: fbaada49082c23aa4e4ed43386a1ad4a457a0354
commit: 02956abc74ede6549249eb21e5b319b92dd147f3 [2570/2570] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent
config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20241210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241210/202412100719.EfO2Bdyg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241210/202412100719.EfO2Bdyg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412100719.EfO2Bdyg-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:15:
In file included from include/linux/etherdevice.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:1581:
include/linux/vmstat.h:431:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
431 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:32:
In file included from include/net/dsa.h:22:
include/net/devlink.h:28:19: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum devlink_reload_limit' and 'enum devlink_reload_action') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
28 | u32 reload_stats[DEVLINK_RELOAD_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/net/devlink.h:25:30: note: expanded from macro 'DEVLINK_RELOAD_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE'
25 | (__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/net/devlink.h:29:26: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum devlink_reload_limit' and 'enum devlink_reload_action') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
29 | u32 remote_reload_stats[DEVLINK_RELOAD_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/net/devlink.h:25:30: note: expanded from macro 'DEVLINK_RELOAD_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE'
25 | (__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
2320 | mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
| ^
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:4: note: did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h:457:19: note: 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write' declared here
457 | static inline int mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
| ^
3 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait +2320 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
2306
2307 static void mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
2308 {
2309 struct gpio_desc *gpiod = chip->reset;
2310
2311 /* If there is a GPIO connected to the reset pin, toggle it */
2312 if (gpiod) {
2313 /* If the switch has just been reset and not yet completed
2314 * loading EEPROM, the reset may interrupt the I2C transaction
2315 * mid-byte, causing the first EEPROM read after the reset
2316 * from the wrong location resulting in the switch booting
2317 * to wrong mode and inoperable.
2318 */
2319 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
> 2320 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2321
2322 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
2323 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2324 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
2325 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2326
2327 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
2328 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2329 }
2330 }
2331
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202412100719.EfO2Bdyg-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sanglipeng1@jd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.