From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Cc: chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2] iommu/vt-d: Fix qi_batch NULL pointer with nested parent domain
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:03:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241210130322.17175-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> (raw)
The qi_batch is allocated when assigning cache tag for a domain. While
for nested parent domain, it is missed. Hence, when trying to map pages
to the nested parent, NULL dereference occurred. Also, there is potential
memleak since there is no lock around domain->qi_batch allocation.
To solve it, add a helper for qi_batch allocation, and call it in both
the __cache_tag_assign_domain() and __cache_tag_assign_parent_domain().
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000200
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 8104795067 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 223 UID: 0 PID: 4357 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-00028-g4b50c3c3b998-dirty #2632
Call Trace:
? __die+0x24/0x70
? page_fault_oops+0x80/0x150
? do_user_addr_fault+0x63/0x7b0
? exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x220
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
? cache_tag_flush_range_np+0x13c/0x260
intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map+0x1a/0x30
iommu_map+0x61/0xf0
batch_to_domain+0x188/0x250
iopt_area_fill_domains+0x125/0x320
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x50
iopt_map_pages+0x63/0x100
iopt_map_common.isra.0+0xa7/0x190
iopt_map_user_pages+0x6a/0x80
iommufd_ioas_map+0xcd/0x1d0
iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x118/0x1c0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x71/0x140
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Fixes: 705c1cdf1e73 ("iommu/vt-d: Introduce batched cache invalidation")
Co-developed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
Change log:
v2:
- Fix it by allocating domain->qi_batch under domain->cache_lock (Baolu)
- Simplify the calltrace log in commit message (Baolu)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20241207120304.5710-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
---
drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
index e5b89f728ad3..09694cca8752 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
@@ -105,12 +105,35 @@ static void cache_tag_unassign(struct dmar_domain *domain, u16 did,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->cache_lock, flags);
}
+/* domain->qi_batch will be freed in iommu_free_domain() path. */
+static int domain_qi_batch_alloc(struct dmar_domain *domain)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->cache_lock, flags);
+ if (domain->qi_batch)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ domain->qi_batch = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain->qi_batch), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!domain->qi_batch)
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->cache_lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __cache_tag_assign_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain, u16 did,
struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
int ret;
+ ret = domain_qi_batch_alloc(domain);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = cache_tag_assign(domain, did, dev, pasid, CACHE_TAG_IOTLB);
if (ret || !info->ats_enabled)
return ret;
@@ -139,6 +162,10 @@ static int __cache_tag_assign_parent_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain, u16 did,
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
int ret;
+ ret = domain_qi_batch_alloc(domain);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = cache_tag_assign(domain, did, dev, pasid, CACHE_TAG_NESTING_IOTLB);
if (ret || !info->ats_enabled)
return ret;
@@ -190,13 +217,6 @@ int cache_tag_assign_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain,
u16 did = domain_get_id_for_dev(domain, dev);
int ret;
- /* domain->qi_bach will be freed in iommu_free_domain() path. */
- if (!domain->qi_batch) {
- domain->qi_batch = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain->qi_batch), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!domain->qi_batch)
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
ret = __cache_tag_assign_domain(domain, did, dev, pasid);
if (ret || domain->domain.type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-10 13:03 Yi Liu [this message]
2024-12-11 8:35 ` [PATCH v2] iommu/vt-d: Fix qi_batch NULL pointer with nested parent domain Tian, Kevin
2024-12-11 9:27 ` Yi Liu
2024-12-12 5:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-12-12 7:27 ` Yi Liu
2024-12-13 2:45 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241210130322.17175-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.