All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,minchan@kernel.org,senozhatsky@chromium.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:55:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241211005510.842DFC4CED6@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: zram: cond_resched() in writeback loop
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: cond_resched() in writeback loop
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:53:55 +0900

Patch series "zram: split page type read/write handling".

This is a subset of [1] series which contains only fixes and improvements
(no new features, as ZRAM_HUGE split is still under consideration).

The motivation for factoring out is that zram_write_page() gets more and
more complex all the time, because it tries to handle too many scenarios:
ZRAM_SAME store, ZRAM_HUGE store, compress page store with zs_malloc
allocation slowpath and conditional recompression, etc.  Factor those out
and make things easier to handle.

Addition of cond_resched() is simply a fix, I can trigger watchdog from
zram writeback().  And early slot free is just a reasonable thing to do.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20241119072057.3440039-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org


This patch (of 6):

Writeback loop can run for quite a while (depending on wb device
performance, compression algorithm and the number of entries we
writeback), so we need to do cond_resched() there, similarly to what we do
in recompress loop.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241210105420.1888790-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241210105420.1888790-2-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -889,6 +889,8 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct de
 next:
 		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 		release_pp_slot(zram, pps);
+
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 	if (blk_idx)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are

zram-panic-when-use-ext4-over-zram-fix.patch
zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop.patch
zram-free-slot-memory-early-during-write.patch
zram-remove-entry-element-member.patch
zram-factor-out-zram_same-write.patch
zram-factor-out-zram_huge-write.patch
zram-factor-out-different-page-types-read.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2024-12-11  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11  0:55 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-19  0:58 + zram-cond_resched-in-writeback-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241211005510.842DFC4CED6@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.