All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurkash@quicinc.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 03/15] ufs: qcom: convert to use UFSHCD_QUIRK_CUSTOM_CRYPTO_PROFILE
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 20:19:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241213041958.202565-4-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241213041958.202565-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

By default the UFS core is responsible for initializing the
blk_crypto_profile, but Qualcomm platforms have their own way of
programming and evicting crypto keys.  So currently
ufs_hba_variant_ops::program_key is used to redirect control flow from
ufshcd_program_key().  This has worked until now, but it's a bit of a
hack, given that the key (and algorithm ID etc.) ends up being converted
from blk_crypto_key => ufs_crypto_cfg_entry => SCM call parameters,
where the intermediate ufs_crypto_cfg_entry step is unnecessary.  Taking
a similar approach with the upcoming wrapped key support, the
implementation of which is similarly platform-specific, would require
adding four new methods to ufs_hba_variant_ops, changing program_key to
take the struct blk_crypto_key, and adding a new UFSHCD_CAP_* flag to
indicate support for wrapped keys.

This patch takes a different approach.  It changes ufs-qcom to use the
existing UFSHCD_QUIRK_CUSTOM_CRYPTO_PROFILE which was recently added for
ufs-exynos.  This allows it to override the full blk_crypto_profile,
eliminating the need for the existing ufs_hba_variant_ops::program_key
and the hooks that would have been needed for wrapped key support.  It
does require a bit of duplicated code to read the crypto capability
registers, but it's worth the simplification in design with ufs-qcom and
ufs-exynos now using the same method to customize the crypto profile,
and it makes it much easier to add wrapped key support.

Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> # sm8650
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index e33ae71245dd..de37d5933ca9 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -110,15 +110,22 @@ static inline void ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 {
 	if (host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO)
 		qcom_ice_enable(host->ice);
 }
 
+static const struct blk_crypto_ll_ops ufs_qcom_crypto_ops; /* forward decl */
+
 static int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 {
 	struct ufs_hba *hba = host->hba;
+	struct blk_crypto_profile *profile = &hba->crypto_profile;
 	struct device *dev = hba->dev;
 	struct qcom_ice *ice;
+	union ufs_crypto_capabilities caps;
+	union ufs_crypto_cap_entry cap;
+	int err;
+	int i;
 
 	ice = of_qcom_ice_get(dev);
 	if (ice == ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)) {
 		dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
 		ice = NULL;
@@ -126,12 +133,42 @@ static int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ice))
 		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ice);
 
 	host->ice = ice;
-	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
 
+	/* Initialize the blk_crypto_profile */
+
+	caps.reg_val = cpu_to_le32(ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_CCAP));
+
+	/* The number of keyslots supported is (CFGC+1) */
+	err = devm_blk_crypto_profile_init(dev, profile, caps.config_count + 1);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	profile->ll_ops = ufs_qcom_crypto_ops;
+	profile->max_dun_bytes_supported = 8;
+	profile->dev = dev;
+
+	/*
+	 * Currently this driver only supports AES-256-XTS.  All known versions
+	 * of ICE support it, but to be safe make sure it is really declared in
+	 * the crypto capability registers.  The crypto capability registers
+	 * also give the supported data unit size(s).
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < caps.num_crypto_cap; i++) {
+		cap.reg_val = cpu_to_le32(ufshcd_readl(hba,
+						       REG_UFS_CRYPTOCAP +
+						       i * sizeof(__le32)));
+		if (cap.algorithm_id == UFS_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS &&
+		    cap.key_size == UFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256)
+			profile->modes_supported[BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS] |=
+				cap.sdus_mask * 512;
+	}
+
+	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
+	hba->quirks |= UFSHCD_QUIRK_CUSTOM_CRYPTO_PROFILE;
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 {
@@ -147,36 +184,53 @@ static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_suspend(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 		return qcom_ice_suspend(host->ice);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int ufs_qcom_ice_program_key(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-				    const union ufs_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg,
-				    int slot)
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_program(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
+					const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
+					unsigned int slot)
 {
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = ufs_hba_from_crypto_profile(profile);
 	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
-	union ufs_crypto_cap_entry cap;
-
-	if (!(cfg->config_enable & UFS_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE))
-		return qcom_ice_evict_key(host->ice, slot);
+	int err;
 
 	/* Only AES-256-XTS has been tested so far. */
-	cap = hba->crypto_cap_array[cfg->crypto_cap_idx];
-	if (cap.algorithm_id != UFS_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS ||
-	    cap.key_size != UFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256)
+	if (key->crypto_cfg.crypto_mode != BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	return qcom_ice_program_key(host->ice,
-				    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS,
-				    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256,
-				    cfg->crypto_key,
-				    cfg->data_unit_size, slot);
+	ufshcd_hold(hba);
+	err = qcom_ice_program_key(host->ice,
+				   QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS,
+				   QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256,
+				   key->raw,
+				   key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size / 512,
+				   slot);
+	ufshcd_release(hba);
+	return err;
 }
 
-#else
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_evict(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
+				      const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
+				      unsigned int slot)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = ufs_hba_from_crypto_profile(profile);
+	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
+	int err;
+
+	ufshcd_hold(hba);
+	err = qcom_ice_evict_key(host->ice, slot);
+	ufshcd_release(hba);
+	return err;
+}
 
-#define ufs_qcom_ice_program_key NULL
+static const struct blk_crypto_ll_ops ufs_qcom_crypto_ops = {
+	.keyslot_program	= ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_program,
+	.keyslot_evict		= ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_evict,
+};
+
+#else
 
 static inline void ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 {
 }
 
@@ -1820,11 +1874,10 @@ static const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_qcom_vops = {
 	.suspend		= ufs_qcom_suspend,
 	.resume			= ufs_qcom_resume,
 	.dbg_register_dump	= ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs,
 	.device_reset		= ufs_qcom_device_reset,
 	.config_scaling_param = ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param,
-	.program_key		= ufs_qcom_ice_program_key,
 	.reinit_notify		= ufs_qcom_reinit_notify,
 	.mcq_config_resource	= ufs_qcom_mcq_config_resource,
 	.get_hba_mac		= ufs_qcom_get_hba_mac,
 	.op_runtime_config	= ufs_qcom_op_runtime_config,
 	.get_outstanding_cqs	= ufs_qcom_get_outstanding_cqs,
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-13  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13  4:19 [PATCH v10 00/15] Support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption keys Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 01/15] ufs: qcom: fix crypto key eviction Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 02/15] ufs: crypto: add ufs_hba_from_crypto_profile() Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 04/15] ufs: crypto: remove ufs_hba_variant_ops::program_key Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 05/15] mmc: sdhci-msm: fix crypto key eviction Eric Biggers
2024-12-19 13:48   ` Ulf Hansson
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 06/15] mmc: crypto: add mmc_from_crypto_profile() Eric Biggers
2024-12-19 13:48   ` Ulf Hansson
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 07/15] mmc: sdhci-msm: convert to use custom crypto profile Eric Biggers
2024-12-19 13:48   ` Ulf Hansson
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 08/15] firmware: qcom: scm: add calls for wrapped key support Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 09/15] soc: qcom: ice: make qcom_ice_program_key() take struct blk_crypto_key Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 10/15] blk-crypto: add basic hardware-wrapped key support Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 11/15] blk-crypto: show supported key types in sysfs Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 12/15] blk-crypto: add ioctls to create and prepare hardware-wrapped keys Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 13/15] fscrypt: add support for " Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 14/15] soc: qcom: ice: add HWKM support to the ICE driver Eric Biggers
2024-12-13  4:19 ` [PATCH v10 15/15] ufs: qcom: add support for wrapped keys Eric Biggers
2025-01-02 18:38 ` [PATCH v10 00/15] Support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption keys Eric Biggers
2025-01-02 18:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-01-02 18:44   ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-09 18:27 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
2025-01-10  8:44 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-01-10 19:10   ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-10 21:16 ` (subset) " Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241213041958.202565-4-ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=quic_gaurkash@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.