From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org,hch@lst.de,stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: fix zero byte checking in the superblock scrubber" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 09:52:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024121521-squeegee-certified-9462@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x c004a793e0ec34047c3bd423bcd8966f5fac88dc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024121521-squeegee-certified-9462@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From c004a793e0ec34047c3bd423bcd8966f5fac88dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:57:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix zero byte checking in the superblock scrubber
The logic to check that the region past the end of the superblock is all
zeroes is wrong -- we don't want to check only the bytes past the end of
the maximally sized ondisk superblock structure as currently defined in
xfs_format.h; we want to check the bytes beyond the end of the ondisk as
defined by the feature bits.
Port the superblock size logic from xfs_repair and then put it to use in
xfs_scrub.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.15
Fixes: 21fb4cb1981ef7 ("xfs: scrub the secondary superblocks")
Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
index 88063d67cb5f..9f8c312dfd3c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
@@ -59,6 +59,32 @@ xchk_superblock_xref(
/* scrub teardown will take care of sc->sa for us */
}
+/*
+ * Calculate the ondisk superblock size in bytes given the feature set of the
+ * mounted filesystem (aka the primary sb). This is subtlely different from
+ * the logic in xfs_repair, which computes the size of a secondary sb given the
+ * featureset listed in the secondary sb.
+ */
+STATIC size_t
+xchk_superblock_ondisk_size(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ if (xfs_has_metadir(mp))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_pad);
+ if (xfs_has_metauuid(mp))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_meta_uuid);
+ if (xfs_has_crc(mp))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_lsn);
+ if (xfs_sb_version_hasmorebits(&mp->m_sb))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_bad_features2);
+ if (xfs_has_logv2(mp))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_logsunit);
+ if (xfs_has_sector(mp))
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_logsectsize);
+ /* only support dirv2 or more recent */
+ return offsetofend(struct xfs_dsb, sb_dirblklog);
+}
+
/*
* Scrub the filesystem superblock.
*
@@ -75,6 +101,7 @@ xchk_superblock(
struct xfs_buf *bp;
struct xfs_dsb *sb;
struct xfs_perag *pag;
+ size_t sblen;
xfs_agnumber_t agno;
uint32_t v2_ok;
__be32 features_mask;
@@ -388,8 +415,8 @@ xchk_superblock(
}
/* Everything else must be zero. */
- if (memchr_inv(sb + 1, 0,
- BBTOB(bp->b_length) - sizeof(struct xfs_dsb)))
+ sblen = xchk_superblock_ondisk_size(mp);
+ if (memchr_inv((char *)sb + sblen, 0, BBTOB(bp->b_length) - sblen))
xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, bp);
xchk_superblock_xref(sc, bp);
reply other threads:[~2024-12-15 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024121521-squeegee-certified-9462@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.