From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,vbabka@suse.cz,stable@vger.kernel.org,david@redhat.com,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,yangge1116@126.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 21:19:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241216051958.10F2AC4CED0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm, compaction: don't use ALLOC_CMA in long term GUP flow
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: yangge <yangge1116@126.com>
Subject: mm, compaction: don't use ALLOC_CMA in long term GUP flow
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 18:01:07 +0800
Since commit 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags in
__compaction_suitable()") allow compaction to proceed when free pages
required for compaction reside in the CMA pageblocks, it's possible that
__compaction_suitable() always returns true, and in some cases, it's not
acceptable.
There are 4 NUMA nodes on my machine, and each NUMA node has 32GB of
memory. I have configured 16GB of CMA memory on each NUMA node, and
starting a 32GB virtual machine with device passthrough is extremely slow,
taking almost an hour.
During the start-up of the virtual machine, it will call
pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to allocate memory. Long
term GUP cannot allocate memory from CMA area, so a maximum of 16 GB of
no-CMA memory on a NUMA node can be used as virtual machine memory. Since
there is 16G of free CMA memory on the NUMA node, watermark for order-0
always be met for compaction, so __compaction_suitable() always returns
true, even if the node is unable to allocate non-CMA memory for the
virtual machine.
For costly allocations, because __compaction_suitable() always returns
true, __alloc_pages_slowpath() can't exit at the appropriate place,
resulting in excessively long virtual machine startup times.
Call trace:
__alloc_pages_slowpath
if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED ||
compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
goto nopage; // should exit __alloc_pages_slowpath() from here
In order to quickly fall back to remote node, we should remove ALLOC_CMA
both in __compaction_suitable() and __isolate_free_page() in long term GUP
flow. After this fix, starting a 32GB virtual machine with device
passthrough takes only a few seconds.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1734256867-19614-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Fixes: 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags in __compaction_suitable()")
Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge1116@126.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/compaction.h | 6 ++++--
mm/compaction.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++-
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h~mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow
+++ a/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ extern enum compact_result try_to_compac
struct page **page);
extern void reset_isolation_suitable(pg_data_t *pgdat);
extern bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
- int highest_zoneidx);
+ int highest_zoneidx,
+ unsigned int alloc_flags);
extern void compaction_defer_reset(struct zone *zone, int order,
bool alloc_success);
@@ -108,7 +109,8 @@ static inline void reset_isolation_suita
}
static inline bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
- int highest_zoneidx)
+ int highest_zoneidx,
+ unsigned int alloc_flags)
{
return false;
}
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2379,9 +2379,11 @@ static enum compact_result compact_finis
static bool __compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
int highest_zoneidx,
+ unsigned int alloc_flags,
unsigned long wmark_target)
{
unsigned long watermark;
+ bool use_cma;
/*
* Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction to be able to
* isolate free pages for migration targets. This means that the
@@ -2393,25 +2395,27 @@ static bool __compaction_suitable(struct
* even if compaction succeeds.
* For costly orders, we require low watermark instead of min for
* compaction to proceed to increase its chances.
- * ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in CMA pageblocks are considered
- * suitable migration targets
+ * In addition to long term GUP flow, ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in
+ * CMA pageblocks are considered suitable migration targets
*/
watermark = (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
low_wmark_pages(zone) : min_wmark_pages(zone);
watermark += compact_gap(order);
+ use_cma = !!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA);
return __zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, highest_zoneidx,
- ALLOC_CMA, wmark_target);
+ use_cma ? ALLOC_CMA : 0, wmark_target);
}
/*
* compaction_suitable: Is this suitable to run compaction on this zone now?
*/
-bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
+bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order, int highest_zoneidx,
+ unsigned int alloc_flags)
{
enum compact_result compact_result;
bool suitable;
- suitable = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx,
+ suitable = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES));
/*
* fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are due to
@@ -2472,7 +2476,7 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct
available = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) / order;
available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
if (__compaction_suitable(zone, order, ac->highest_zoneidx,
- available))
+ alloc_flags, available))
return true;
}
@@ -2497,7 +2501,7 @@ compaction_suit_allocation_order(struct
alloc_flags))
return COMPACT_SUCCESS;
- if (!compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx))
+ if (!compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2812,6 +2812,7 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *pag
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
+ bool pin;
if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) {
unsigned long watermark;
@@ -2822,7 +2823,8 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *pag
* exists.
*/
watermark = zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN] + (1UL << order);
- if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, ALLOC_CMA))
+ pin = !!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN);
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, pin ? 0 : ALLOC_CMA))
return 0;
}
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -5861,7 +5861,7 @@ static inline bool should_continue_recla
sc->reclaim_idx, 0))
return false;
- if (compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx))
+ if (compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx, ALLOC_CMA))
return false;
}
@@ -6089,7 +6089,7 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(stru
return true;
/* Compaction cannot yet proceed. Do reclaim. */
- if (!compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx))
+ if (!compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx, ALLOC_CMA))
return false;
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yangge1116@126.com are
mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow.patch
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 5:19 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-16 16:57 + mm-compaction-dont-use-alloc_cma-in-long-term-gup-flow.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241216051958.10F2AC4CED0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yangge1116@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.