From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] iomap: Add zero unwritten mappings dio support
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241217070845.GA19358@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241214005638.GJ6678@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 04:56:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > "If you receive -EBADMAP, then call fallocate(FALLOC_FL_MAKE_OVERWRITE)
> > > to force all the mappings to pure overwrites."
> >
> > Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
> >
> > That's not a sane API in any way.
>
> Oh I know, I'd much rather stick to the view that block untorn writes
> are a means for programs that only ever do IO in large(ish) blocks to
> take advantage of a hardware feature that also wants those large
> blocks.
I (vaguely) agree ith that.
> And only if the file mapping is in the correct state, and the
> program is willing to *maintain* them in the correct state to get the
> better performance.
I kinda agree with that, but the maintain is a bit hard as general
rule of thumb as file mappings can change behind the applications
back. So building interfaces around the concept that there are
entirely stable mappings seems like a bad idea.
> I don't want xfs to grow code to write zeroes to
> mapped blocks just so it can then write-untorn to the same blocks.
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-10 12:57 [PATCH v2 0/7] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iomap: Increase iomap_dio_zero() size limit John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iomap: Add zero unwritten mappings dio support John Garry
2024-12-11 23:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-12 10:40 ` John Garry
2024-12-12 20:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-13 10:43 ` John Garry
2024-12-13 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-14 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-17 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-12-18 11:15 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 1:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-08 11:39 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 17:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-09 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 11:59 ` John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xfs: Add extent zeroing support for " John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xfs: Add RT atomic write unit max to xfs_mount John Garry
2024-12-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xfs: Update xfs_get_atomic_write_attr() for large atomic writes John Garry
2024-12-13 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] large atomic writes for xfs Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 17:15 ` John Garry
2024-12-13 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 17:43 ` John Garry
2024-12-14 0:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-16 8:40 ` John Garry
2024-12-17 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-17 8:23 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241217070845.GA19358@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.