[PATCH 6.12 039/172] bpf: Revert "bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

commit c00d738e1673ab801e1577e4e3c780ccf88b1a5b upstream.

This patch reverts commit
cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"). The
patch was well-intended and meant to be as a stop-gap fixing branch
prediction when the pointer may actually be NULL at runtime. Eventually,
it was supposed to be replaced by an automated script or compiler pass
detecting possibly NULL arguments and marking them accordingly.

However, it caused two main issues observed for production programs and
failed to preserve backwards compatibility. First, programs relied on
the verifier not exploring == NULL branch when pointer is not NULL, thus
they started failing with a 'dereference of scalar' error.  Next,
allowing raw_tp arguments to be modified surfaced the warning in the
verifier that warns against reg->off when PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set.

More information, context, and discusson on both problems is available
in [0]. Overall, this approach had several shortcomings, and the fixes
would further complicate the verifier's logic, and the entire masking
scheme would have to be removed eventually anyway.

Hence, revert the patch in preparation of a better fix avoiding these
issues to replace this commit.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com

Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com>
Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h                                      |    6 -
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                                         |    5 
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                                    |   79 +--------------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c |    6 -
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3471,10 +3471,4 @@ static inline bool bpf_is_subprog(const
 	return prog->aux->func_idx != 0;
 }
 
-static inline bool bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
-	       prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP;
-}
-
 #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6564,10 +6564,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, e
 	if (prog_args_trusted(prog))
 		info->reg_type |= PTR_TRUSTED;
 
-	/* Raw tracepoint arguments always get marked as maybe NULL */
-	if (bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(prog))
-		info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
-	else if (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable"))
+	if (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable"))
 		info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
 
 	if (tgt_prog) {
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -418,25 +418,6 @@ static struct btf_record *reg_btf_record
 	return rec;
 }
 
-static bool mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) {
-	return reg->type == (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL) &&
-	       bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(env->prog) && !reg->ref_obj_id;
-}
-
-static bool mask_raw_tp_reg(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
-{
-	if (!mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg))
-		return false;
-	reg->type &= ~PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
-	return true;
-}
-
-static void unmask_raw_tp_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, bool result)
-{
-	if (result)
-		reg->type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
-}
-
 static bool subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_info_aux *aux = env->prog->aux->func_info_aux;
@@ -6618,7 +6599,6 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struc
 	const char *field_name = NULL;
 	enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0;
 	u32 btf_id = 0;
-	bool mask;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
@@ -6690,21 +6670,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struc
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	/* For raw_tp progs, we allow dereference of PTR_MAYBE_NULL
-	 * trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID, these are the ones that are possibly
-	 * arguments to the raw_tp. Since internal checks in for trusted
-	 * reg in check_ptr_to_btf_access would consider PTR_MAYBE_NULL
-	 * modifier as problematic, mask it out temporarily for the
-	 * check. Don't apply this to pointers with ref_obj_id > 0, as
-	 * those won't be raw_tp args.
-	 *
-	 * We may end up applying this relaxation to other trusted
-	 * PTR_TO_BTF_ID with maybe null flag, since we cannot
-	 * distinguish PTR_MAYBE_NULL tagged for arguments vs normal
-	 * tagging, but that should expand allowed behavior, and not
-	 * cause regression for existing behavior.
-	 */
-	mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
+
 	if (ret != PTR_TO_BTF_ID) {
 		/* just mark; */
 
@@ -6765,13 +6731,8 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struc
 		clear_trusted_flags(&flag);
 	}
 
-	if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
+	if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
 		mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id, flag);
-		/* We've assigned a new type to regno, so don't undo masking. */
-		if (regno == value_regno)
-			mask = false;
-	}
-	unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -7146,7 +7107,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_v
 		if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
 			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
 	} else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID &&
-		   (mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg) || !type_may_be_null(reg->type))) {
+		   !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) {
 		err = check_ptr_to_btf_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t,
 					      value_regno);
 	} else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) {
@@ -8844,7 +8805,6 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_ver
 	enum bpf_reg_type type = reg->type;
 	u32 *arg_btf_id = NULL;
 	int err = 0;
-	bool mask;
 
 	if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE)
 		return 0;
@@ -8885,11 +8845,11 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_ver
 	    base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK)
 		arg_btf_id = fn->arg_btf_id[arg];
 
-	mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 	err = check_reg_type(env, regno, arg_type, arg_btf_id, meta);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
-	err = err ?: check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type);
-	unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
+	err = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -9684,17 +9644,14 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(stru
 				return ret;
 		} else if (base_type(arg->arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID) {
 			struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta;
-			bool mask;
 			int err;
 
 			if (register_is_null(reg) && type_may_be_null(arg->arg_type))
 				continue;
 
 			memset(&meta, 0, sizeof(meta)); /* leave func_id as zero */
-			mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 			err = check_reg_type(env, regno, arg->arg_type, &arg->btf_id, &meta);
 			err = err ?: check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg->arg_type);
-			unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		} else {
@@ -12009,7 +11966,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 		enum bpf_arg_type arg_type = ARG_DONTCARE;
 		u32 regno = i + 1, ref_id, type_size;
 		bool is_ret_buf_sz = false;
-		bool mask = false;
 		int kf_arg_type;
 
 		t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
@@ -12068,15 +12024,12 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 		if ((is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) || is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) &&
 		    (register_is_null(reg) || type_may_be_null(reg->type)) &&
 			!is_kfunc_arg_nullable(meta->btf, &args[i])) {
 			verbose(env, "Possibly NULL pointer passed to trusted arg%d\n", i);
-			unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
-		unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 
 		if (reg->ref_obj_id) {
 			if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && meta->ref_obj_id) {
@@ -12134,24 +12087,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 			if (!is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) && !is_kfunc_rcu(meta))
 				break;
 
-			/* Allow passing maybe NULL raw_tp arguments to
-			 * kfuncs for compatibility. Don't apply this to
-			 * arguments with ref_obj_id > 0.
-			 */
-			mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 			if (!is_trusted_reg(reg)) {
 				if (!is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) {
 					verbose(env, "R%d must be referenced or trusted\n", regno);
-					unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 					return -EINVAL;
 				}
 				if (!is_rcu_reg(reg)) {
 					verbose(env, "R%d must be a rcu pointer\n", regno);
-					unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 					return -EINVAL;
 				}
 			}
-			unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 			fallthrough;
 		case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX:
 		case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
@@ -12174,9 +12119,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 
 		if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && reg->ref_obj_id)
 			arg_type |= OBJ_RELEASE;
-		mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 		ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type);
-		unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -12353,7 +12296,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 			ref_tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ref_t->name_off);
 			fallthrough;
 		case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
-			mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg);
 			/* Only base_type is checked, further checks are done here */
 			if ((base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID ||
 			     (bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type) && !is_rcu_reg(reg))) &&
@@ -12362,11 +12304,9 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_v
 				verbose(env, "expected %s or socket\n",
 					reg_type_str(env, base_type(reg->type) |
 							  (type_flag(reg->type) & BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS)));
-				unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
 			ret = process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(env, reg, ref_t, ref_tname, ref_id, meta, i);
-			unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 			break;
@@ -13336,7 +13276,7 @@ static int sanitize_check_bounds(struct
  */
 static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				   struct bpf_insn *insn,
-				   struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
+				   const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
 				   const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state;
@@ -13350,7 +13290,6 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
 	struct bpf_sanitize_info info = {};
 	u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
 	u32 dst = insn->dst_reg;
-	bool mask;
 	int ret;
 
 	dst_reg = &regs[dst];
@@ -13377,14 +13316,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
-	mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, ptr_reg);
 	if (ptr_reg->type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) {
 		verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited, null-check it first\n",
 			dst, reg_type_str(env, ptr_reg->type));
-		unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask);
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
-	unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask);
 
 	switch (base_type(ptr_reg->type)) {
 	case PTR_TO_CTX:
@@ -19934,7 +19870,6 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct b
 		 * for this case.
 		 */
 		case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED:
-		case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL:
 			if (type == BPF_READ) {
 				if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM)
 					insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c
@@ -7,11 +7,7 @@
 #include "bpf_misc.h"
 
 SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_nullable_bare")
-/* This used to be a failure test, but raw_tp nullable arguments can now
- * directly be dereferenced, whether they have nullable annotation or not,
- * and don't need to be explicitly checked.
- */
-__success
+__failure __msg("R1 invalid mem access 'trusted_ptr_or_null_'")
 int BPF_PROG(handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare1, struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *nullable_ctx)
 {
 	return nullable_ctx->len;