From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916F085C5E for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734545800; cv=none; b=Nty7M7KoMwNFcBO82WD2z8wpiDsAl24yabjHRkMWE/Nx39eqqqfgUcBcubXZf0eSjfOKOquLeN4JMWviEzZi73zbBDpQeY4snvseYNaUYfnJk0Wc9f8ZdtC/fTCwtwppH9rNVzSxr8w3SdC5ZrOwGrmpfSHUaWqRjxkYRvxVgTg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734545800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YqopJ40cPjz4ggkZmdZ37kc19kHxRkr2yzwUbFgVtiI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NPc/kL1QWN6d4vJdxu1pYrXfL/Dtr4No7GzTdxDBgEdOJmzJMWvuJXdZwuTrvR6Jd3K4JaD/gclxx9VScN9K76/y0TAYYJrVn9+f3k1R62AwDNa59JT9nCeGn5bVkTpZtSDSMzIuZncx9R+qFLuYEDvNK2vWwHnMNTlKOFOMFr8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=a2OE+a8M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a2OE+a8M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16AA2C4CECD; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734545800; bh=YqopJ40cPjz4ggkZmdZ37kc19kHxRkr2yzwUbFgVtiI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a2OE+a8MwctIMT8Xabx7SRw6KmxjYfjVD0A2fs10hWNlZDCE3e5sBnAmARe3FxPwM LEOY99rNs89cuSLDk1BYrBgsQs09Hx5P0ZqFxST3LozNiHZhLJA78muxTgfy4JlgfG PkkvXwdKXBS+OT6dYdg79XUwbYgvFIUmKnoZD+vl3EmBdxPfS97kNeD/frEDgJLO1h JzToX0UaCqnYFW/5thH3pzbd02xT1IDChROzbH+YS9OcAiSxn2ZYMyKwRy9yqFCKyA rKXzfd+bKcNn7+hqe+vDAOygw3SsOEOnPdo7vS3sAMIXY6KcWa8FFkKB4hM/pTqCnV lGLhdudtROdsQ== Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:16:39 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Hans Holmberg , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/43] xfs: disable reflink for zoned file systems Message-ID: <20241218181639.GY6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20241211085636.1380516-1-hch@lst.de> <20241211085636.1380516-37-hch@lst.de> <20241213231247.GG6678@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20241215062654.GH10855@lst.de> <20241217171055.GJ6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20241218070934.GA25652@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241218070934.GA25652@lst.de> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:09:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:10:55AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Mostly intellectual curiosity on my part about self-reorganizing > > filesystems. The zonegc you've already written is good enough for now, > > though the no-reflink requirement feels a bit onerous. > > The no-reflink is mostly because we want a minimum viable merge candidate, > and our initial uses for things like lsm databases and objects stores > don't strongly need it. I hope to add reflink support ~ 2 or 3 merge > windows after the initial code. --D