All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Nina Schoetterl-Glausch" <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/14] s390x/pv: prepare for memory devices
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:41:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241219144115.2820241-12-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241219144115.2820241-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's avoid checking for the maxram_size, and instead rely on the memory
limit determined in s390_memory_init(), that might be larger than
maxram_size, for example due to alignment purposes.

This check now correctly mimics what the kernel will check in
kvm_s390_pv_set_aside(), whereby a VM <= 2 GiB VM would end up using
a segment type ASCE.

Message-ID: <20241008105455.2302628-12-david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/kvm/pv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c b/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
index 424cce75ca..fa66607e7b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ bool s390_pv_vm_try_disable_async(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
      * If the feature is not present or if the VM is not larger than 2 GiB,
      * KVM_PV_ASYNC_CLEANUP_PREPARE fill fail; no point in attempting it.
      */
-    if ((MACHINE(ms)->ram_size <= 2 * GiB) ||
+    if (s390_get_memory_limit(ms) <= 2 * GiB ||
         !kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE)) {
         return false;
     }
-- 
2.47.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-19 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-19 14:41 [PATCH v3 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes David Hildenbrand
2024-12-24 12:32   ` Michael Tokarev
2024-12-24 12:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall* David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit() David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] s390x/s390-hypercall: introduce DIAG500 STORAGE_LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare for memory devices and sparse memory layouts David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] s390x/s390-skeys: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: " David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] s390x: remember the maximum page size David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] s390x/virtio-ccw: add support for virtio based memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-12-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241219144115.2820241-12-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.