Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/lttpr: Enable Extended Wake Timeout

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

Hi Suraj,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip v6.13-rc3 next-20241220]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Suraj-Kandpal/drm-dp-Add-the-DPCD-register-required-for-Extended-wake-timeout/20241213-140525
base:   linus/master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213060317.2674290-3-suraj.kandpal%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/lttpr: Enable Extended Wake Timeout
config: x86_64-randconfig-r121-20241220 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412210956.FV7RWpOY-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412210956.FV7RWpOY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412210956.FV7RWpOY-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c:146:26: sparse: sparse: Initializer entry defined twice
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c:148:26: sparse:   also defined here

vim +146 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c

   136	
   137	void intel_dp_lttpr_wake_timeout_setup(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
   138	{
   139		struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
   140		u8 val = 1;
   141		int ret;
   142	
   143		if (intel_dp_lttpr_transparent_mode_enabled(intel_dp)) {
   144			static const u8 timeout_mapping[] = {
   145				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_1_MS] = 1,
 > 146				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_20_MS] = 20,
   147				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_40_MS] = 40,
   148				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_20_MS] = 20,
   149				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_80_MS] = 80,
   150				[DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_100_MS] = 100,
   151			};
   152	
   153			ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
   154						DP_EXTENDED_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_REQUEST, &val);
   155			if (ret != 1) {
   156				drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
   157					    "Failed to read Extended sleep wake timeout request\n");
   158				return;
   159			}
   160	
   161			val = (val < sizeof(timeout_mapping) && timeout_mapping[val]) ?
   162				timeout_mapping[val] : 1;
   163	
   164			drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EXTENDED_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_GRANT,
   165					   DP_DPRX_SLEEP_WAKE_TIMEOUT_PERIOD_GRANTED);
   166		} else {
   167			ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
   168						DP_PHY_REPEATER_EXTENDED_WAIT_TIMEOUT, &val);
   169			if (ret != 1) {
   170				drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
   171					    "Failed to read Extended sleep wake timeout request\n");
   172				return;
   173			}
   174	
   175			val = (val & DP_EXTENDED_WAKE_TIMEOUT_REQUEST_MASK) ?
   176				(val & DP_EXTENDED_WAKE_TIMEOUT_REQUEST_MASK) * 10 : 1;
   177	
   178			drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PHY_REPEATER_EXTENDED_WAIT_TIMEOUT,
   179					   DP_EXTENDED_WAKE_TIMEOUT_GRANT);
   180		}
   181	}
   182	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki