From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B122166307; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734862329; cv=none; b=CG/1gBM8KZunnpsrLhMcTylNdlGGIH3uPeYqDAExzo9bFovRXczDBE60NeSdUVSlnCv17t+FcIer95GPLSTUc+3+gQykCv16Fw3QjVAhG+3bihCqPi72ZF85AIbrgFiRcgcYrorTGtUVGMcuL2KbmkwCAab5ibHCVm8kMOSp32Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734862329; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1a/VWzSTWvMsj0hpc/06I4Wuwlht3P8XrS/Yg3s+rHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EwwM6Y1+qhMjca1YKfWcAh3DeyOdGKvSp6TmYDGk2EbRRJzyibPgh4t0X/iX+E6/LJc8Y1lFBi1nYuUnp9ERm+dO7v2f4MihEE0KiNgTvOzlVnpJKKfsABFnz1VFqGY+ksySJxRV9jGNMoi8xVA+DbUtm9rP+9tTtMNnUAsqdH4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b4pO863C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b4pO863C" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A82C4C4CECD; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:12:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734862328; bh=1a/VWzSTWvMsj0hpc/06I4Wuwlht3P8XrS/Yg3s+rHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b4pO863CNudzApW679dCKY6oEHNfLnRGrTgF7YgWRdi9hQkPU5EIWwKLy2Hxa5MCe KhTdDDZaS+vKKf5dU7ZtgH80yduLz9x/zDVi1OvZ2+acALsm1t7/+XGdvRvTAz4gUH aqWqjceV7UhvmAVWjFrxdge07Jkk2D4GS0MTCF83NtzKd7PARSAgjhxbOaSa65s0Qa Nzph0cXb5vuv1iMhoDDT1AjjN/dDYFiS4oh2jlJKxuMCY6nE+rCbsKQKwgbOnHQfNB 5kijrs+eKQPjRdKctZApnCQLAbtGQsys2nOqFOh7ZJL8hwuVKiX8xpbnI93TtOoLfX UQYTDR8bYQEkw== Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 11:12:03 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Christian Brauner , Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] efivarfs: fix error on write to new variable leaving remnants Message-ID: <20241222-anmut-liegt-fe3ab4c1fee5@brauner> References: <20241210170224.19159-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> <20241210170224.19159-7-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> <6e09c8a812a85cb96a75391abcc48bee3b2824e9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6e09c8a812a85cb96a75391abcc48bee3b2824e9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> > Do the fs people have a preference? The cursor mark is simpler to > implement but depends on internal libfs.c magic. The actor hijack is at > least something that already exists, so would be less prone to breaking > due to internal changes. I think making this filesystem specific is better than plumbing this into dcache_readdir().