From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11 RFC] Allow concurrent changes in a directory
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:22:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241223052243.GL1977892@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241220030830.272429-1-neilb@suse.de>
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 01:54:18PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Not all calling code has been converted. Some callers outside of
> fs/namei.c still take an exclusive lock with i_rw_sem. Some might never
> be changed.
>
> As yet this has only been lightly tested as I haven't add foo_shared
> operations to any filesystem yet.
It's still fundamentally broken. You assume that shared lock on
parent is enough to prevent the parent/name changes of children.
That assumption is simply not true.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-23 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 2:54 [PATCH 00/11 RFC] Allow concurrent changes in a directory NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 01/11] VFS: introduce vfs_mkdir_return() NeilBrown
2024-12-23 5:04 ` Al Viro
2024-12-23 7:26 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] VFS: add _shared versions of the various directory modifying inode_operations NeilBrown
2024-12-23 5:08 ` Al Viro
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] VFS: change kern_path_locked() and user_path_locked_at() to never return negative dentry NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] VFS: introduce done_lookup_and_lock() NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] VFS: introduce lookup_and_lock() NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] VFS: add inode_dir_lock/unlock NeilBrown
2024-12-21 1:21 ` Hillf Danton
2024-12-23 3:10 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-23 11:12 ` Hillf Danton
2024-12-23 20:36 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-24 10:26 ` Hillf Danton
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 09/11] VFS: re-pack DENTRY_ flags NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 10/11] VFS: take a shared lock for create/remove directory operations NeilBrown
2024-12-23 5:19 ` Al Viro
2024-12-23 7:11 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-23 7:26 ` Al Viro
2024-12-23 20:40 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-20 2:54 ` [PATCH 11/11] nfsd: use lookup_and_lock_one() NeilBrown
2024-12-20 20:55 ` [PATCH 00/11 RFC] Allow concurrent changes in a directory Andreas Dilger
2024-12-23 5:22 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241223052243.GL1977892@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.